# two college dropouts built a $100m AI company in 11 months. here's exactly how they did it.
**作者**: m0h
**日期**: 2026-05-06T12:16:18.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533)
---
this article is based on the story of two college dropouts, naz and qazi, who build poppy AI to a $100m company in just 11 months after launch. fully bootstrapped, no funding.
poppy AI is a AI tool helps content creators, founders, and marketers make VIRAL content & ads with AI while saving 100's of hours per month.
> hey, i'm m0h. i research and write on how people use AI to build wealth, scale their brand, and improve their life. this article is based on a Jack Neel podcast — so bookmark and read it.
this one's broken into 6 sections, exactly how naz and qazi went from $0 to $100m. zero BS, zero filler.
- product-founder fit: build for yourself first: their MVP philosophy: "if you don't use it daily, you don't have conviction."
- the one-influencer breakthrough: why your big audience won't buy: the 30k-follower tiktok story + why conviction beats follower count.
- price for cash flow, not for users: the $1k/year playbook: why they killed monthly plans and free trials, and how it funded their growth.
- reverse-engineer your sales page from customer language: the "neurospicy" insight + the headline-word revenue tracking system. genuinely fresh.
- affiliate distribution is the unfair advantage: smaller-influencer math, why paid sponsorships lose money, and how to structure deals.
- hire for vibes, not skills: the actual scaling unlock. culture-fit philosophy, the 6-month developer chase, and the "thumbs up emoji" rule.
## product-founder fit: build for yourself first
most builders chase product-market fit. naz and qazi flipped it.
their rule was simpler: build something you'd use every day, regardless of whether anyone else wants it. they called it product-founder fit and it's the reason poppy survived its first six months when every traditional metric said the product was failing.
they had two combined audiences pushing 1.5m followers across instagram and youtube. they pitched poppy to those audiences for six straight months. zero traction. emails to 300k subscribers, zero sales. youtube videos were not converting. webinars too, nothing.
by every "validate it with money" framework, poppy was a dead product.
but they kept building. why?
because they were using poppy themselves every single day. qazi said it directly: "these people are just stupiid, they don't get it. this is an amazing product."
not arrogance, conviction earned by being their own first user.
most founders quit at month three. naz and qazi survived month six because they weren't building for the market. they were building for themselves, and the market hadn't caught up yet.
the takeaway: before you build anything, ask one question, would I open this app every single day if no one else used it?
if the answer is NO! you don't have product-founder fit, and you'll quit the first time the market doesn't validate you.
if the answer is YES! you can survive six months of zero sales because you're still using your own product.
## the one-influencer breakthrough: why your big audience won't buy
naz and qazi had a combined 1.5m followers. zero of them bought poppy.
they emailed 300k subscribers, nothing.
ran instagram content to a 150k audience, nothing.
dropped videos on a 1m-subscriber youtube channel, nothing.
ran daily webinars for weeks, still nothing.
by every distribution metric they'd built over 8 years, the product was a complete failure.
then they reached out to a tiktoker with 30,000 followers. she made one video. it pulled 1.5m views and made them $150,000 in two weeks.
here's the part most founders miss: the difference wasn't reach, it was conviction.
naz and qazi's 1.5m audience knew them as coding educators. when they pitched a content tool, the audience didn't believe in it because the audience wasn't there for that problem.
the 30k tiktoker actually used poppy. her video was a 3-minute deep-dive tutorial, no hooks, no mr. beast attention hacks, just her showing how the product solved a real problem in her workflow. people bought because she clearly believed.
qazi put it bluntly:
> anytime you have somebody who doesn't believe in your product, it doesn't convert. even if they have massive following.
the takeaway: your existing audience is the worst signal you'll ever get. they followed you for one thing, they're not your customer for a different thing.
instead of pitching to your followers, find one creator (any size) who genuinely uses your product and will demo it like a friend recommending it. one believer with 30k beats a 1m audience that doesn't get it.
## price for cash flow, not for users: the $1k/year playbook
most SaaS founders price like uber or netflix. naz and qazi priced like a course creator.
while every competitor charged $10–$30/month and offered free trials, poppy launched at $98/yr annual only. no monthly plan. no free trial.
for months, monthly billing didn't even exist as an option. they later raised it again, and now poppy averages around $1,000/year per customer.
the math behind it is simple, but almost nobody does it. a $20/month SaaS with a free trial pays an affiliate $2–$5 per referral. a $1,000/year product pays $80–$300.
one of poppy's affiliates made $50,000 in a single month. that's not possible at $20/month, the unit economics literally won't allow it.
qazi was direct about why monthly pricing kills bootstrapped startups:
> a lot of people just look at what uber eats is doing or what the biggest software company in the world is doing and try to replicate that, not realizing how much money you actually need to afford to offer free trials to hundreds of thousands of people.
free trials work for vc-backed companies burning cash. they bankrupt bootstrappers.
the higher price did three things at once: it generated 8x more cash flow per customer, it made affiliates actually want to promote poppy, and it filtered for serious users (lower churn, higher ltv).
the takeaway: if you're bootstrapped, price for cash flow, not user count. annual plans front-load revenue you can reinvest immediately. higher prices fund higher commissions, which attract better affiliates, which drive better growth.
don't copy uber's pricing model unless you have uber's bank account. the math only works one way.
## reverse-engineer your sales page from customer language
most founders write sales copy from the inside out, they describe what their product does in their own words. naz and qazi did the opposite. they let customers write the page for them.
after their first $150k week, they took 200+ onboarding calls back-to-back over two weeks. brutal schedule, 8am to 2am some days. but every call ended with qazi pulling the same trick: he'd write down the exact phrasing customers used to describe themselves and their problems.
one customer kept calling herself "neurospicy" said she was ADHD, neurodivergent, couldn't process text, needed visual workspaces.
qazi got off the call, opened the sales page, and wrote that exact word into the copy. sales spiked. people started messaging him: "I was on the fence until I saw 'neurospicy' on your page, that's literally me."
he didn't stop there. they tracked which words drove the most revenue. every poppy buyer fills out a tally form on signup describing themselves. qazi typed each word into the data and measured what it made:
- "copywriter" → $10k/month
- "founder" → $40k/month
- "content creator" → $100k/month
the headline now reads: "made for content creators, founders, and marketers" in that exact order, ranked by revenue.
the takeaway: stop writing your sales page. interview 20 customers, transcribe the calls, and copy-paste their phrasing onto the page.
then track which words convert. your customers know how to sell your product better than you do, they just need you to listen and tag the data.
## affiliate distribution is the unfair advantage
big creators don't sell products. small ones do.
every traditional marketing playbook says: "land the biggest influencer you can afford." poppy's data says the opposite. Ali Abdaal, millions of subscribers, barely converted for them. Vanessa Lao, a smaller creator, drove the bulk of their early growth.
naz and qazi tried both. the math kept saying the same thing: small creators with genuine conviction beat big creators with paid contracts every time.
here's why. big influencers charge upfront, $10k, $50k, sometimes more. they read scripts. their audience knows it's an ad. conversion is low. you lose money. small influencers don't have those expectations. they're flexible. they'll work on commission. they have the bandwidth to actually use your product before promoting it.
qazi was direct about it:
> we do not do a deal with anybody who does not love the product. period. we've tried it and every single time it's not profitable. we lose money on that deal every single time.
their actual workflow:
1. find a creator on instagram (smaller is better, 30k–100k followers)
2. give them free access. let them use it for two weeks
3. only do a deal if they come back saying they love it
4. structure as commission-first
5. when one converts, turn that result into a case study and use it to recruit the next 50
one creator's success becomes the recruitment tool for the next ten. that's how poppy went from one viral tiktok to thousands of affiliates in under a year.
the takeaway: stop chasing big names. find creators who already need your product, give them free access, and let conviction do the selling.
one believer with 30k followers will outperform a paid contract with 5m followers, every time. and once one converts, you have proof that recruits the rest for free.
## hire for vibes, not skills
most founders hire on resumes. naz and qazi hire on energy.
their rule sounds absurd until you understand the cost: nobody on poppy's team is allowed to use the thumbs-up or thumbs-down emoji. it's flame and 100 only. that's not a vibe, it's a filter.
it screens out the kind of person who treats work as transactional, who answers "got it" to everything, who'll cash a paycheck without running through walls when the company needs it.
they learned this the hard way. they hired one sales guy with elite skills but a serious, joyless culture fit. he closed $80k–$100k cash in his first weeks. impressive.
but three months later, almost every customer he closed had refunded, and the team was still cleaning up the mess. they fired him. they're still recovering.
the contrast: lance. came from target, no partnerships background. but he pays for affiliate tools out of his own pocket without asking. he covers costs the company would have approved anyway. that's culture fit. that's someone making the right call when no one's watching.
then there's their lead developer. qazi spent 6 months chasing him. weekly check-ins. comments on every piece of his content. eventually qazi recorded a 45-minute video personally pitching the vision to him.
no one had ever taken that level of effort to recruit him before. he joined. in his first month, the team shipped more than they had in the previous six.
qazi's rule: "if i had sam altman as my co-founder, he would perform worse than lance on this team for poppy."
the takeaway: skill is fungible. culture isn't. when you hire only on skill, you'll close $80k and lose $200k. when you hire on values, you'll get someone who covers costs out of their own pocket and ships in one month what others ship in six.
spend 6 months recruiting the right person, that's faster than spending 12 months unwinding the wrong one.
## the playbook in one breath
build something you'd use daily. find one believer, not a thousand strangers. price for cash flow. let your customers write your headline. partner with creators who already love you. hire for the people who'd run through walls.
that's it. that's how naz and qazi built poppy ai to $100m in 11 months.
no funding. no shortcuts. no playbook stolen from a company with a different bank account.
now go build yours. this article episode was extracted from Jack Neel's podcast with the founder of Poppy AI. you can check the full podcast here.
~m0h
## 相关链接
- [m0h](https://x.com/exploraX_)
- [@exploraX_](https://x.com/exploraX_)
- [706](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533/analytics)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [$1k](https://x.com/search?q=%241k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$1k](https://x.com/search?q=%241k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$150k](https://x.com/search?q=%24150k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$10k](https://x.com/search?q=%2410k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$40k](https://x.com/search?q=%2440k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100k](https://x.com/search?q=%24100k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$10k](https://x.com/search?q=%2410k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$50k](https://x.com/search?q=%2450k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$80k](https://x.com/search?q=%2480k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$200k](https://x.com/search?q=%24200k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [here.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql3SYT7ONZU&t=75s)
- [Upgrade to Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [8:16 PM · May 6, 2026](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533)
- [706 Views](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533/analytics)
---
*导出时间: 2026/5/6 21:42:09*
---
## 中文翻译
# 两个大学辍学生在11个月内建立了一家价值1亿美元的AI公司。这就是他们具体的做法。
**作者**: m0h
**日期**: 2026-05-06T12:16:18.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533)
---
本文基于两个大学辍学生 Naz 和 Qazi 的故事，他们在 Poppy AI 发布后的短短11个月内，将其打造成了一家价值1亿美元的公司。完全依靠自力更生，没有融资。
Poppy AI 是一款 AI 工具，帮助内容创作者、创始人和营销人员利用 AI 制作爆款内容和广告，同时每月节省数百小时的工作时间。
> 嘿，我是 m0h。我研究和撰写关于人们如何利用 AI 构建财富、扩大品牌规模和改善生活的内容。本文基于 Jack Neel 的一期播客——所以请收藏并阅读。
这篇文章分为6个部分，详细介绍了 Naz 和 Qazi 是如何从0做到1亿美元的。零废话，零填充。
- **产品-创始人契合度：先为自己而建**：他们的 MVP 哲学是：“如果你自己都不每天使用它，你就没有信念。”
- **单红人突破：为什么你的大受众不会购买**：3万粉丝的 TikTok 故事 + 为什么信念胜过粉丝数量。
- **为现金流定价，而不是为用户**：每年1000美元的攻略：为什么他们取消了月付计划和免费试用，以及这如何资助了他们的增长。
- **从客户语言反向设计你的销售页**：“神经大条（neurospicy）”洞察 + 标题词汇收入追踪系统。真正的新颖。
- **联盟分销是不公平的优势**：小网红的数学逻辑，为什么付费赞助会亏钱，以及如何构建交易。
- **为氛围而雇佣，不为技能**：真正的规模解锁。文化契合哲学，为期6个月的开发者追逐，以及“竖大拇指表情符号”规则。
## 产品-创始人契合度：先为自己而建
大多数建造者追逐产品-市场契合度。Naz 和 Qazi 颠覆了这一点。
他们的规则更简单：构建一些你自己每天都会使用的东西，不管其他人是否想要它。他们称之为产品-创始人契合度，这就是 Poppy 在其前六个月幸存下来的原因，尽管当时所有传统指标都显示该产品正在失败。
他们合计拥有150万粉丝，横跨 Instagram 和 YouTube。他们连续六个月向这些受众推销 Poppy。零转化。发给30万订阅者的邮件，零销量。YouTube 视频没有转化。网络研讨会也一样，一无所获。
按照每一个“用金钱验证”的框架，Poppy 都是一个死掉的产品。
但他们继续构建。为什么？
因为他们自己每天都在使用 Poppy。Qazi 直截了当地说：“这些人就是愚蠢，他们不懂。这是一个惊人的产品。”
不是傲慢，而是通过成为自己的第一个用户赢得的信念。
大多数创始人在第三个月就放弃了。Naz 和 Qazi 挺过了第六个月，因为他们不是在为市场构建。他们是在为自己构建，而市场还没有跟上。
要点：在你构建任何东西之前，问一个问题，如果其他人都不用，我会每天打开这个应用程序吗？
如果答案是 NO！你没有产品-创始人契合度，一旦市场不验证你，你就会放弃。
如果答案是 YES！你可以挺过六个月的零销量，因为你仍然在使用你自己的产品。
## 单红人突破：为什么你的大受众不会购买
Naz 和 Qazi 合计拥有150万粉丝。其中没有一个人购买 Poppy。
他们给30万订阅者发了邮件，毫无结果。
在 Instagram 上向15万受众投放内容，毫无结果。
在拥有100万订阅者的 YouTube 频道上发布视频，毫无结果。
连续几周举办每日网络研讨会，依然毫无结果。
按照他们在8年内建立的所有分销指标来看，该产品是一个彻底的失败。
然后他们联系了一位拥有3万粉丝的 TikTok 网红。她制作了一个视频。该视频获得了150万次观看，并在两周内为他们带来了15万美元的收入。
这是大多数创始人错过的部分：区别不在于触达范围，而在于信念。
Naz 和 Qazi 的150万受众将他们视为编程教育者。当他们推销一个内容工具时，受众不相信它，因为受众不是冲着那个问题来的。
那位3万粉丝的 TikTok 网红实际上使用了 Poppy。她的视频是一个3分钟的深度教程，没有钩子，没有 Mr. Beast 的注意力技巧，只是她展示了产品如何解决她工作流程中的一个实际问题。人们购买是因为她显然是相信的。
Qazi 坦率地说：
> 任何时候，如果有不相信你产品的人，就不会有转化。即使他们拥有庞大的粉丝群。
要点：你现有的受众是你能收到的最糟糕的信号。他们因为一件事关注你，他们不会因为你做的另一件事而成为你的客户。
不要向你的粉丝推销，而是找到一位真正使用你产品的创作者（任何规模），他会像朋友推荐一样演示它。一个拥有3万粉丝的信徒胜过100万不懂行的受众。
## 为现金流定价，而不是为用户：每年1000美元的攻略
大多数 SaaS 创始人的定价像 Uber 或 Netflix。Naz 和 Qazi 的定价像课程创作者。
当每个竞争对手收取10-30美元/月并提供免费试用时，Poppy 推出的价格是98美元/年，仅限年付。没有月付计划。没有免费试用。
几个月来，甚至不存在按月付款这个选项。他们后来再次提价，现在 Poppy 平均每个客户每年收费约1000美元。
背后的数学逻辑很简单，但几乎没有人这样做。一个带有免费试用的20美元/月 SaaS 向联盟成员支付每次推荐2-5美元。一个1000美元/年的产品支付80-300美元。
Poppy 的一位联盟成员单月赚了5万美元。在20美元/月的情况下这是不可能的，单位经济学根本不允许。
Qazi 直接地说明了为什么月度定价会扼杀自力更生的初创公司：
> 很多人只是看 Uber Eats 在做什么或世界上最大的软件公司在做什么，并试图复制它，却没有意识到你实际上需要多少钱才能负担得起为数十万人提供免费试用。
免费试用适用于烧钱的 VC 支持公司。它们会让自力更生者破产。
更高的价格同时做了三件事：它产生了8倍的客户现金流，它使联盟成员真正想要推广 Poppy，并且它筛选了认真的用户（更低的流失率，更高的 LTV）。
要点：如果你是自力更生的，请为现金流定价，而不是为了用户数量。年度计划预加载你可以立即再投资的收入。更高的价格资助更高的佣金，从而吸引更好的联盟成员，从而推动更好的增长。
除非你有 Uber 的银行账户，否则不要复制 Uber 的定价模式。数学逻辑只有一种行得通。
## 从客户语言反向设计你的销售页
大多数创始人在撰写销售文案时是从内向外写的，他们用自己的语言描述他们的产品做什么。Naz 和 Qazi 做了相反的事情。他们让客户为他们写页面。
在他们第一个15万美元的一周之后，他们在两周内连续进行了200多次入职通话。时间表残酷，有时从早上8点一直工作到凌晨2点。但每次通话结束时，Qazi 都会用同样的技巧：他会记下客户用来描述自己和问题的确切措辞。
一位客户一直称自己为“神经大条”，说她有 ADHD，神经多样性，无法处理文本，需要视觉工作空间。
Qazi 挂断电话，打开销售页，并将那个确切的词写进了文案。销量激增。人们开始给他发信息：“看到你页面上写着‘神经大条’之前我还在犹豫，这简直就是我的写照。”
他没有就此止步。他们追踪哪些词带来了最多的收入。每个 Poppy 买家在注册时都会填写一个计数表单来描述自己。Qazi 将每个词输入数据并测量它产生了什么：
- “文案” → 1万美元/月
- “创始人” → 4万美元/月
- “内容创作者” → 10万美元/月
现在的标题写道：“专为内容创作者、创始人和营销人员打造”，顺序完全如此，按收入排名。
要点：停止写你的销售页。采访20个客户，转录通话，并将他们的措辞复制粘贴到页面上。
然后追踪哪些词转化。你的客户比你更懂得如何销售你的产品，他们只需要你倾听并标记数据。
## 联盟分销是不公平的优势
大创作者不卖产品。小创作者卖。
每一本传统的营销攻略都说：“尽可能找到你能负担得起的最大的网红。”Poppy 的数据说的恰恰相反。Ali Abdaal，数百万订阅者，几乎没有什么转化。Vanessa Lao，一个较小的创作者，推动了他们早期增长的大部分。
Naz 和 Qazi 两个都试过。数学计算总是说同样的事情：拥有真正信念的小创作者总是击败拥有付费合同的大创作者。
原因如下。大网红要预付款，1万美元，5万美元，有时更多。他们读脚本。他们的观众知道这是广告。转化率低。你赔钱。小网红没有这些期望。他们很灵活。他们愿意按佣金工作。他们有带宽在推广之前实际使用你的产品。
Qazi 对此很直率：
> 我们不会与任何不喜欢该产品的人做交易。就这样。我们试过，每一次都不盈利。我们在那笔交易上每一次都亏钱。
他们的实际工作流程：
1. 在 Instagram 上找到一个创作者（越小越好，3万-10万粉丝）
2. 给他们免费访问权限。让他们使用两周
3. 只有在他们回来说他们喜欢它时才做交易
4. 构建为以佣金为主
5. 当一个转化时，将该结果转化为案例研究，并用它来招募下50个
一个创作者的成功成为招募下十个人的工具。这就是 Poppy 如何在不到一年的时间里从一个病毒式 TikTok 发展到数千名联盟成员的。
要点：停止追逐大名字。找到已经需要你产品的创作者，给他们免费访问权限，让信念来做销售。
一个拥有3万粉丝的信徒每次都会胜过与500万粉丝的付费合同。而且一旦一个转化了，你就有了免费招募其余人的证据。
## 为氛围而雇佣，不为技能
大多数创始人根据简历雇佣。Naz 和 Qazi 根据能量雇佣。
他们的规则听起来很荒谬，直到你理解了代价：Poppy 团队中的任何人都被禁止使用竖大拇指或竖拇指向下的表情符号。只有火焰和100。这不是氛围，这是一个过滤器。
它筛选出那些将工作视为交易的人，对一切都说“收到”的人，以及当公司需要时不会全力以赴而只顾兑现薪水的人。
他们是吸取了惨痛教训才学到这一点的。他们雇佣了一位销售 guy，拥有精英技能但严重缺乏乐趣的文化契合度。他在前几周完成了8万-10万美元的现金收入。令人印象深刻。
但三个月后，他几乎成交的每个客户都退款了，团队仍在清理烂摊子。他们解雇了他。他们仍在恢复中。
对比一下：Lance。来自 Target，没有合作伙伴关系背景。但他会自掏腰包购买联盟工具，无需询问。他涵盖了公司本来也会批准的成本。这就是文化契合。这就是那个在没人看着时做出正确决定的人。
还有他们的首席开发者。Qazi 花了6个月时间追逐他。每周检查。评论他的每一条内容。最终，Qazi 录制了一段45分钟的视频，亲自向他推销愿景。
以前从来没有人费这么大劲招募他。他加入了。在他入职的第一个月，团队交付的东西比之前六个月加起来还多。
Qazi 的规则：“如果我有 Sam Altman 作为我的联合创始人，他在 Poppy 的这个团队上的表现会比 Lance 差。”
要点：技能是可替代的。文化不是。当你只根据技能雇佣时，你会成交8万美元却损失20万美元。当你根据价值观雇佣时，你会得到一个自掏腰包覆盖成本、并在一个月内交付其他人六个月才能交付的量的人。
花6个月的时间招募合适的人，这比花12个月的时间去解决错误的人要快。
## 一口气总结全攻略
构建你会每天使用的东西。找到一个信徒，而不是一千个陌生人。为现金流定价。让你的客户写你的标题。与已经喜欢你的创作者合作。雇佣那些愿意全力以赴的人。
就是这样。这就是 Naz 和 Qazi 在11个月内将 Poppy AI 做到1亿美元的方法。
没有融资。没有捷径。没有从银行账户不同的公司偷来的攻略。
现在去构建你的吧。本文摘录自 Jack Neel 与 Poppy AI 创始人的播客。你可以在这里查看完整的播客。
~m0h
## 相关链接
- [m0h](https://x.com/exploraX_)
- [@exploraX_](https://x.com/exploraX_)
- [706](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533/analytics)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [$1k](https://x.com/search?q=%241k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$1k](https://x.com/search?q=%241k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$150k](https://x.com/search?q=%24150k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$10k](https://x.com/search?q=%2410k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$40k](https://x.com/search?q=%2440k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100k](https://x.com/search?q=%24100k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$10k](https://x.com/search?q=%2410k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$50k](https://x.com/search?q=%2450k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$80k](https://x.com/search?q=%2480k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$200k](https://x.com/search?q=%24200k&src=cashtag_click)
- [$100m](https://x.com/search?q=%24100m&src=cashtag_click)
- [here.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ql3SYT7ONZU&t=75s)
- [Upgrade to Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [8:16 PM · May 6, 2026](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533)
- [706 Views](https://x.com/exploraX_/status/2051999496565821533/analytics)
---
*导出时间: 2026/5/6 21:42:09*