# 20 Claude Prompts that turn a $20 Subscription into a personal Assistant, Editor, Coach, and Analyst
**作者**: Anatoli Kopadze
**日期**: 2026-04-29T14:14:37.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950)
---
You pay $20/month for Claude. Most people use 10% of it.
Ask a question. Rewrite a text. Summarize a document. That's the average Claude session.
That's not using Claude. That's wasting it.
Claude can be your fitness coach, your language tutor, your negotiation trainer, your financial analyst, your editor, your strategist. Not approximately. Literally. The only variable is the quality of your prompt.
These 20 prompts cover real situations in a real person's life. Take what you need. Skip what you don't. Use them as a base to build your own.
Save this.
## Deep research
1. Multi-Source Synthesis
Stop reading 5 articles separately. Paste all of them into one conversation and ask Claude to distill everything into a single, conflict-resolved brief. It catches what each article missed. It spots where they disagree. You get in 3 minutes what would take you 90 minutes of reading.
```
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.
```
2. Devil's Advocate Mode
Before you commit to any idea, plan, or decision - ask Claude to argue against it as hard as it can. Not politely. Not with caveats. With the strongest possible case for why you're wrong. The holes it finds are the ones that would have killed you later.
```
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack.
Here is my idea / plan / decision:
[DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
Attack it across 4 dimensions:
1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong?
2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice?
3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave?
4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it?
Rules:
- Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize.
- Don't soften your language. Be direct.
- If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered.
- End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.
```
3. Steelman Any Position
You disagree with something. Before you dismiss it, ask Claude to steelman it - build the best, most charitable, most intelligent version of the argument. Not to change your mind. To understand what smart people on the other side actually believe. This is how you stop being surprised.
```
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY]
My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE]
Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons.
Structure your steelman as follows:
1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on?
2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully?
3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking?
4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver
Rules:
- Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours.
- Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position.
- Argue as if you genuinely believe it.
- The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."
```
04. Mental Model Builder
Any topic you don't understand - ask Claude to teach it as a series of connected mental models. Not facts. Not a summary. A framework you can think with. 10 minutes later you can explain it to someone else and apply it to new situations. This is the difference between knowing and understanding.
```
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT]
Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model:
- NAME: What is this model called?
- CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this
- HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC]
- CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize
- COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model?
After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show?
End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.
```
## Writing
5. Style mimic
Paste 3 samples of your own writing. Ask Claude to analyze your style — rhythm, vocabulary, sentence length, how you open paragraphs, how you close them. Then give it a topic and ask it to write in your voice. Not generic AI. Your voice. The output will be closer to what you'd write than what you'd produce on a blank page.
```
You are a style analyst and ghostwriter. Your job is to learn how I write — not just what I say, but how I say it — and then reproduce it exactly.
Here are 3 samples of my writing:
SAMPLE 1:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 2:
[PASTE]
SAMPLE 3:
[PASTE]
Step 1 — Analyze my style across these dimensions:
- Sentence length and rhythm (short punchy / long flowing / mixed)
- Vocabulary level (simple / technical / conversational)
- How I open paragraphs
- How I close ideas
- What I never do (passive voice / filler words / certain structures)
- The "signature move" — one thing that makes my writing instantly recognizable
Step 2 — Write a [FORMAT: thread / article / email / post] about [TOPIC] in my voice.
Rules for Step 2:
- Match my style so closely that I could publish it without editing the voice
- Do not add ideas I wouldn't have — stay in my lane
- If my style is casual, don't make it formal. If it's punchy, don't pad it.
```
6. The Brutal Editor
Paste your draft. Ask Claude to destroy it. Not "improve it." Not "give suggestions." Destroy it. Find every sentence that wastes the reader's time, every idea that isn't earned, every word that could be cut. The version that survives this is the one worth publishing.
```
You are the toughest editor I've ever had. You do not give encouragement. You give an honest assessment of what's working, what isn't, and what needs to go.
Here is my draft:
[PASTE DRAFT]
Edit it across 5 dimensions:
1. CUTS — List every sentence or paragraph that wastes the reader's time. Quote it, then explain why it adds nothing.
2. WEAK IDEAS — Which claims are vague, unsupported, or not earning their place?
3. MISSING — What should be here that isn't? What question does the reader have that I haven't answered?
4. STRUCTURE — Is the order right? Should anything move? Does the opening earn attention? Does the ending land?
5. THE SINGLE BIGGEST PROBLEM — If you could only fix one thing, what is it?
Then: produce the edited version. Cut ruthlessly. Tighten every sentence. Don't add fluff to replace what you cut.
Rules:
- Don't say "great job on X before criticizing." Just edit.
- If the draft is fundamentally broken, say so directly.
- The goal is a version the reader finishes. Not a version that protects my ego.
```
7. One Text, Five Audiences
You wrote something for one person. Ask Claude to rewrite it for five different audiences simultaneously. Same core idea. Completely different tone, vocabulary, and framing for each. A 5-year-old. A domain expert. A skeptic. A journalist. Your CEO. You'll learn more about your own idea from seeing it refracted this way than from any other exercise.
```
You are a master communicator. Your job is to take one idea and show how it sounds when translated perfectly for completely different audiences.
Here is my original text:
[PASTE TEXT]
Rewrite it for these 5 audiences. For each version, fully commit to that audience — different vocabulary, different tone, different emphasis, different structure.
VERSION 1 — THE COMPLETE BEGINNER
No jargon. Use analogies. Assume they know nothing but are intelligent.
VERSION 2 — THE DOMAIN EXPERT
Skip the basics. Use precise terminology. Go deeper than the original. They will notice if you oversimplify.
VERSION 3 — THE SKEPTIC
They don't believe this matters. Lead with the strongest evidence. Anticipate their objection and address it before they raise it.
VERSION 4 — THE JOURNALIST (headline + 2 sentences)
One hook headline. Two sentences that capture the most newsworthy angle. Written to make someone click.
VERSION 5 — THE EXECUTIVE (30 seconds)
Three sentences maximum. What is it, why does it matter, what should they do. No context, no buildup.
After all 5 versions: tell me which one is hardest to write well and why.
```
08. Bullets to Article
You have rough notes. Ideas scattered in bullet points. Fragments. Ask Claude to transform them into a structured, fully written piece. Give it the target length, the target audience, and the tone. The bullets become the skeleton. Claude builds the tissue. You spend your energy on thinking, not formatting.
```
You are a professional writer and editor. I have rough notes. Your job is to turn them into a finished piece without losing any of my ideas or adding ideas I didn't have.
Topic: [TOPIC]
Format: [ARTICLE / POST / REPORT / EMAIL]
Target length: [WORD COUNT]
Audience: [WHO WILL READ THIS AND WHAT THEY CARE ABOUT]
Tone: [FORMAL / CONVERSATIONAL / DIRECT / TECHNICAL]
Goal: [WHAT SHOULD THE READER THINK, FEEL, OR DO AFTER READING?]
Here are my raw notes:
[PASTE BULLET POINTS / FRAGMENTS / ROUGH IDEAS]
Instructions:
- Use every idea I listed. Don't drop anything.
- Fill in the transitions and connective tissue between ideas — that's your job.
- Do not add new ideas I didn't include. You can expand on mine, not invent new ones.
- Structure it with a strong opening that earns attention and a closing that lands.
- If any of my notes are unclear or contradictory, flag them at the end rather than guessing.
Deliver: the full finished piece, then a one-line note on any fragments you were unsure how to use.
```
## Career
9. Salary Negotiation Roleplay
Most people lose thousands in salary negotiations because they've never practiced them. Ask Claude to play your future employer - give it the context, the offer, and their likely objections. Negotiate in real time. Claude will push back. It will use the arguments they use. By the time you walk into the real conversation, you've done it a dozen times.
```
You are a hiring manager at [COMPANY TYPE: startup / enterprise / agency]. You are experienced, professional, and not easily moved. You have a budget constraint and a team dynamic to protect.
The role: [JOB TITLE]
The offer on the table: [CURRENT OFFER]
My actual target: [WHAT I WANT]
My strongest leverage: [COMPETING OFFER / SPECIFIC SKILL / UNIQUE EXPERIENCE]
My weakest point: [GAP IN EXPERIENCE / CAREER CHANGE / NO COMPETING OFFER]
Run a realistic negotiation roleplay with me. You open by confirming the offer.
Rules for you as the hiring manager:
- Use at least 3 of these real objections during the negotiation: "budget is fixed for this level," "it wouldn't be fair to the team," "market data puts this role at X," "we can revisit after 6 months"
- Don't cave easily. Make me work for every dollar.
- If I make a weak argument, push back with a specific counter.
- If I make a strong argument, acknowledge it — but still negotiate.
After the roleplay: give me feedback. What did I do well? What argument did I leave on the table? What was my most effective move?
```
10. Interview Simulator
Paste the job description. Ask Claude to act as the interviewer. It will ask the exact questions that role typically surfaces - behavioral, technical, situational. You answer. It grades you: what landed, what was vague, what you should have said instead. 3 sessions of this and you walk into any interview calm.
```
You are a senior interviewer conducting a realistic job interview. You are professional, attentive, and you do not give easy passes.
Here is the job description:
[PASTE FULL JOB DESCRIPTION]
My background: [2-3 SENTENCES ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT YOU BRING]
The type of interview: [BEHAVIORAL / TECHNICAL / CASE / MIXED]
Run the interview. Ask one question at a time. Wait for my answer before continuing.
After each answer, give structured feedback:
- STRONG: What worked in my answer
- WEAK: What was vague, missing, or unconvincing
- WHAT I SHOULD HAVE SAID: The key point or structure I didn't use
Then ask the next question.
Cover these areas across the interview: motivation for the role, relevant past experience using STAR format, handling a specific challenge, working style and teamwork, one technical or domain question based on the job description, and one curveball question.
After the final question: give me an overall assessment. Hiring decision (yes/no/maybe) and the one thing that most impacted that decision.
```
11. Resume Multiplier
You have one resume. But every job you apply to is different. Paste your resume and three different job descriptions. Ask Claude to produce three versions - each one pulling forward the experience that matters most for that specific role. Same truth. Completely different emphasis. Your resume stops being one-size-fits-none.
```
You are a professional resume writer and career strategist. Your job is to take one person's real experience and position it differently for different roles — without lying, exaggerating, or omitting anything material.
Here is my current resume:
[PASTE FULL RESUME]
Here are 3 job descriptions I'm targeting:
JOB 1: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 2: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
JOB 3: [PASTE JOB DESCRIPTION]
For each job, produce a tailored resume version with these changes:
- Reorder bullet points so the most relevant experience for that role appears first
- Rewrite bullet points to use the exact language and keywords from that job description
- Adjust the summary/headline to speak directly to what that company is looking for
- Remove or de-emphasize experience irrelevant to that specific role
Rules:
- Every fact must remain accurate. Do not invent or inflate anything.
- Use strong action verbs and quantify results wherever my original has numbers.
- Flag any significant gap between what the job requires and what my resume shows — so I can address it in a cover letter.
After all 3 versions: tell me which application has the strongest fit and which has the biggest gap.
```
12. Difficult Conversation Prep
You need to have a hard conversation. With your manager. A client. A co-founder. Most people go in underprepared and either say too much or too little. Describe the situation to Claude and ask it to map the conversation: what to say, what they'll likely say back, and how to respond to each scenario. You're not winging it. You're running plays.
```
You are an executive coach and communication strategist. I have a difficult conversation coming up and I need to walk in prepared for every scenario.
Who I'm talking to: [THEIR ROLE AND MY RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM]
What the conversation is about: [THE TOPIC / ISSUE]
What happened: [THE FULL CONTEXT — WHAT LED TO THIS]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO ACHIEVE BY THE END]
My fear: [WHAT I'M MOST WORRIED THEY'LL SAY OR DO]
What I must not do: [ANY RED LINES — DON'T APOLOGIZE / DON'T BACK DOWN / ETC.]
Give me:
1. THE OPENING LINE — Exactly how to start. Clear, direct, not aggressive.
2. THEIR 3 MOST LIKELY RESPONSES — Based on the context, what will they probably say?
3. MY RESPONSE TO EACH — Word-for-word how to handle each scenario
4. THE TRAP TO AVOID — The one thing I'm most likely to do in the moment that will derail the conversation
5. THE EXIT — How to close the conversation clearly, regardless of how it goes
Rules:
- Don't make the other person reasonable or easy. Prepare me for pushback.
- Don't give me corporate language. Give me words I'd actually say.
- If my goal is unrealistic given the context, tell me before I walk in.
```
13. LinkedIn Bio Rewrite
Your LinkedIn bio was written in 10 minutes three years ago. It's either too humble or too generic. Paste it, tell Claude who you want to attract and why, and ask for 5 versions. Different angles. Different tones. You'll pick one and wonder why you waited this long.
```
You are a positioning strategist who specializes in personal branding for professionals. Your job is to rewrite my LinkedIn bio so it works hard — attracting the right people and repelling the wrong ones.
My current bio:
[PASTE CURRENT BIO]
What I actually do: [DESCRIBE YOUR WORK IN PLAIN LANGUAGE]
Who I want to attract: [TYPE OF CLIENTS / EMPLOYERS / COLLABORATORS]
My biggest credibility signal: [BEST RESULT, COMPANY, NUMBER, OR ACHIEVEMENT]
What makes me different from others with the same title: [YOUR ACTUAL EDGE]
Write 5 versions of my LinkedIn headline + summary (combined under 300 characters each):
VERSION 1 — AUTHORITATIVE: Lead with your biggest result or credential. No fluff.
VERSION 2 — CONVERSATIONAL: Write like a human, not a resume. First-person, direct.
VERSION 3 — RESULTS-FOCUSED: Every sentence is a number or outcome. Zero adjectives.
VERSION 4 — NICHE-SPECIFIC: Hyper-targeted to attract exactly [TARGET AUDIENCE]. Others won't get it. That's fine.
VERSION 5 — MINIMAL: Under 100 characters. The essence only.
Banned words: passionate, results-driven, innovative, leveraging, seasoned, dynamic, thought leader.
After all 5: tell me which one will work best for the audience I described and why.
```
## Daily Life
14. Weekly Meal Plan with Shopping List
Tell Claude your dietary preferences, calorie target, and how many minutes you're willing to cook. It builds a full 7-day plan with breakfast, lunch, and dinner - plus a consolidated shopping list organized by grocery section. The decision fatigue of "what do I eat" disappears for the whole week in 3 minutes.
```
You are a professional nutritionist and meal planning specialist. Build me a realistic 7-day meal plan I will actually follow.
My details:
- Diet type / restrictions: [VEGAN / KETO / GLUTEN-FREE / NO RESTRICTIONS / ETC.]
- Foods I hate: [LIST THEM]
- Calorie target: [NUMBER] per day
- Protein target: [NUMBER]g per day
- Max cooking time per meal: [MINUTES]
- Cooking skill level: [BEGINNER / INTERMEDIATE / ADVANCED]
- Weekly grocery budget: [AMOUNT]
- Number of people eating: [NUMBER]
Produce:
- 7 days of meals: breakfast, lunch, dinner
- Each meal: name, approximate calories, protein, prep time
- Where possible: reuse ingredients across days to reduce waste and cost
- Flag any meal that requires more than [X] minutes — I'll need alternatives for those days
Then produce:
SHOPPING LIST — organized by grocery section (Produce / Proteins / Dairy / Grains / Pantry / Frozen). Include quantities.
MEAL PREP GUIDE — what can I prepare on Sunday to make the week easier?
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST — based on average grocery prices.
```
15. Legal Document Translator
You received a contract, a terms-of-service update, a lease agreement, or a privacy policy. You don't understand half of it. Paste it and ask Claude to translate it into plain English - what you're agreeing to, what the risky clauses are, and what you should ask about before signing. You stop flying blind on documents that matter.
```
I need to understand a legal document before I sign it. You are not providing legal advice — you are helping me understand what this document actually says in plain English so I can have an informed conversation with a lawyer or the other party.
Document type: [CONTRACT / LEASE / TERMS OF SERVICE / NDA / EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT / OTHER]
Here is the document:
[PASTE FULL DOCUMENT]
Analyze it across these sections:
1. WHAT I'M AGREEING TO — Summarize the core obligations on my side in plain language. What am I committing to do, pay, or not do?
2. WHAT THEY'RE COMMITTING TO — What are their obligations to me?
3. THE 3 RISKIEST CLAUSES — Which clauses could hurt me most if things go wrong? Quote each one, then explain the risk in plain language.
4. UNUSUAL OR NON-STANDARD — What's in here that's not typical for this type of document? What should I be surprised to see?
5. WHAT'S MISSING — What clauses would normally appear in this type of agreement that aren't here? Does that protect or expose me?
6. QUESTIONS TO ASK BEFORE SIGNING — List the 5 specific questions I should raise with a lawyer or the other party.
Note: This is for my own understanding only, not legal advice.
```
16. Personal Finance Analyzer
Paste your last month's expenses. Ask Claude to categorize them, find the patterns, and identify exactly where money is leaking. Not vague advice like "spend less on dining." Specific observations: "you spent $340 on subscriptions, 4 of which you used less than once this month." That kind of specific is what actually changes behavior.
```
You are a personal finance analyst. Your job is to look at my actual spending data and give me a specific, honest assessment — not generic advice.
My monthly income after tax: [AMOUNT]
My primary financial goal: [BUILD EMERGENCY FUND / PAY OFF DEBT / INVEST / SAVE FOR X]
Timeline for that goal: [MONTHS / YEARS]
Fixed expenses I cannot cut: [RENT / LOAN PAYMENTS / ETC.]
Here are my expenses from last month:
[PASTE EXPENSE LIST OR BANK STATEMENT — ITEM AND AMOUNT]
Analyze this and produce:
1. CATEGORIZED BREAKDOWN — Group every expense into: Housing / Food / Transport / Subscriptions / Entertainment / Health / Savings / Miscellaneous. Show totals per category and percentage of income.
2. THE 3 BIGGEST LEAKS — Not just "you spend a lot on dining." Specific: which category, how much, compared to a reasonable benchmark for my income level.
3. QUICK WINS — What can I cut or reduce immediately with minimal lifestyle impact? Calculate the exact monthly saving for each.
4. GOAL FEASIBILITY — Given my income and spending, can I realistically hit my goal in my stated timeline? If not, what needs to change?
5. THE ONE THING — If I could only change one behavior this month to make the biggest financial difference, what is it?
Be specific. Quote numbers from my actual data. Do not give me generic advice I could read in any blog post.
```
17. Travel Planner
Tell Claude where you're going, how long you have, your budget, and what kind of traveler you are. It builds a day-by-day itinerary with the things most tourists miss - the neighborhood spots, the timing tricks, the things to book in advance. It's not a copy of TripAdvisor. It's a plan that fits you.
```
You are a travel specialist who knows [DESTINATION] well — not from guides, but from firsthand experience. Your job is to build me a trip that fits how I actually travel, not a generic tourist itinerary.
Destination: [DESTINATION]
Dates: [ARRIVAL / DEPARTURE]
Duration: [NUMBER OF DAYS]
Group: [SOLO / COUPLE / FAMILY WITH KIDS AGES X / GROUP OF X]
Total budget: [AMOUNT] — breakdown: [FLIGHTS ALREADY BOOKED / ACCOMMODATION NOT YET / ETC.]
Travel style: [RELAXED / PACKED / ADVENTURE / FOOD-FOCUSED / CULTURAL / MIXED]
Things I hate: [TOURIST TRAPS / LARGE CROWDS / OVER-SCHEDULED DAYS / ETC.]
Things I love: [LOCAL FOOD / ARCHITECTURE / NATURE / NIGHTLIFE / MUSEUMS / ETC.]
Physical limitations (if any): [NONE / LIMITED WALKING / ETC.]
Produce:
DAY-BY-DAY ITINERARY — Morning / Afternoon / Evening for each day. Be specific: name actual places, neighborhoods, restaurants. Include realistic travel times between locations.
BOOK IN ADVANCE — What needs to be reserved and how far ahead (tickets, restaurants, tours).
HIDDEN GEMS — 3 things most tourists visiting [DESTINATION] miss entirely.
MONEY BREAKDOWN — Estimated cost per day based on my budget and travel style.
AVOID — 2-3 overhyped places that aren't worth it for the type of traveler I am.
```
## Learning
18. Feynman Tutor
The Feynman technique: you truly understand something when you can explain it simply. Ask Claude to teach you any topic using this method - it starts simple, checks if you understand, builds complexity only when you're ready, and uses analogies from things you already know. It doesn't move on until the concept is solid. This is not reading. This is learning.
```
You are a master teacher using the Feynman technique. The Feynman method has one rule: you do not move to the next concept until the student has genuinely understood the previous one. Not just nodded. Actually understood.
Topic I want to understand: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [PRACTICAL USE CASE OR GOAL]
How I learn best: [ANALOGIES / EXAMPLES / VISUAL DESCRIPTIONS / STEP-BY-STEP LOGIC]
How to run this session:
1. Start with the most fundamental concept. Explain it in the simplest possible language. No jargon.
2. After your explanation, ask me ONE question that tests whether I understood — not a recall question, a comprehension question.
3. Wait for my answer.
4. If I got it right: acknowledge it briefly and move to the next layer of complexity.
5. If I got it wrong or partly wrong: don't repeat the same explanation. Find a different analogy or framing. Try again.
6. Never explain more than one concept at a time.
7. Use analogies from everyday life — not from the field itself.
Continue until I've understood the full picture.
At the end: ask me to explain the topic back to you in my own words. Tell me what I got right, what I missed, and what I got wrong.
```
19. 30-Day Curriculum Builder
You want to learn a skill. Most people start, get overwhelmed, and quit in week 2 because they don't have a map. Ask Claude to build a day-by-day 30-day curriculum - what to study, in what order, for how long each day, with checkpoints to verify you're actually progressing. The skill stops being "something I want to learn" and becomes a project with a deadline.
```
You are a curriculum designer and learning strategist. I want to learn a skill in 30 days with a structured, realistic plan. Your job is to build that plan — not a reading list, an actual doing plan.
Skill: [SKILL]
My starting level: [COMPLETE BEGINNER / SOME EXPOSURE / INTERMEDIATE]
Time available per day: [MINUTES]
Days per week I can commit: [5-7 / 3-4 / WEEKENDS ONLY]
Goal after 30 days: [EXACTLY WHAT I WANT TO BE ABLE TO DO]
How I learn best: [VIDEOS / READING / PRACTICE PROJECTS / FLASHCARDS / MIXED]
Resources I already have: [BOOKS / COURSES / TOOLS / NONE]
Build the curriculum:
WEEK 1 — FOUNDATIONS: What are the 3-4 core concepts I must understand before everything else? Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 2 — APPLICATION: Move from understanding to doing. What's the first real thing I build, write, or produce?
WEEK 3 — DEPTH: Where do most beginners plateau? Push past it here. Day-by-day tasks.
WEEK 4 — CONSOLIDATION: Review, fix gaps, produce something I'm proud of.
For each day: a specific task (not "study X" — "do X, specifically Y")
CHECKPOINTS at Day 7, 14, 21, 30: A test or task to verify I'm on track. If I fail it, what do I do?
Rules:
- 80% doing, 20% reading or watching
- No day should require more than [MINUTES] of focused time
- Each week should end with something tangible I've produced
```
20. Socratic Mode
This is the most underused thing Claude can do. Instead of asking for answers, ask Claude to teach you through questions. You tell it the topic. It asks you questions. You answer. It builds on your answers, corrects your gaps, and guides you toward understanding through your own thinking. Passive reading creates familiarity. Socratic dialogue creates knowledge. There is a difference, and you feel it immediately.
```
You are a Socratic teacher. You do not explain things. You ask questions. Through those questions, you guide me to discover the answer myself. This is the most demanding form of teaching — and the most effective.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My goal: [WHAT I WANT TO UNDERSTAND OR BE ABLE TO DO]
My current level: [WHAT I THINK I KNOW / COMPLETE BEGINNER]
Rules you must follow — no exceptions:
1. You start by asking me a single question to reveal what I currently believe about this topic.
2. You never give me the answer directly. Guide me to it through follow-up questions.
3. If I'm wrong, don't correct me. Ask a question that makes me realize I'm wrong.
4. If I'm right, push deeper. Ask the next question that takes me further.
5. If I ask you to just explain it, refuse. Say: "What do you think the answer might be?" and continue.
6. Each question should be one sentence. No preambles.
7. Never ask two questions at once.
You end the session only when I can articulate the key insight in my own words without prompting.
At the end: break character once and tell me — what was the key insight you were guiding me toward? What moment in our dialogue showed you I understood it? What would have been the next question if we'd continued?
```
20 techniques. Deep research that beats 90 minutes of reading. Writing that survives a brutal editor. Career prep that makes hard conversations feel rehearsed. A life assistant that handles the decisions that drain you. A tutor that teaches through your own reasoning.
Every one of these is included in your $20/month.
Most people will read this, save it, and go back to asking Claude to summarize emails.
Don't be most people.
## 相关链接
- [Anatoli Kopadze](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze)
- [@AnatoliKopadze](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze)
- [217K](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/analytics)
- [Upgrade to Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [10:14 PM · Apr 29, 2026](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950)
- [217.3K Views](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/analytics)
- [View quotes](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/quotes)
---
*导出时间: 2026/4/30 09:25:29*
---
## 中文翻译
# 20 个 Claude 提示词，让 20 美元的订阅变成你的私人助理、编辑、教练和分析师
**作者**： Anatoli Kopadze
**日期**： 2026-04-29T14:14:37.000Z
**来源**： [https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950)
---
你每月为 Claude 支付 20 美元。但大多数人只用了它的 10%。
问一个问题。改写一段文字。总结一份文档。这就是一般人的 Claude 使用方式。
那不叫使用 Claude。那是在浪费它。
Claude 可以成为你的健身教练、语言导师、谈判训练师、财务分析师、编辑、战略顾问。不是比喻。是真的。唯一的变量是你提示词的质量。
这 20 个提示词覆盖了一个真实的人生活中的真实场景。需要的就拿去用，不需要的就跳过。也可以把它们当作基础，构建你自己的提示词。
收藏这篇。
## 深度研究
1. 多来源综合
别再分开读 5 篇文章了。把它们全部粘贴到同一个对话里，让 Claude 提炼成一份单一的、消除矛盾的简报。它能发现每篇文章各自遗漏的东西，也能看出它们之间的分歧。别人需要 90 分钟的阅读，你 3 分钟就能得到。
```
You are a senior research analyst. Your job is to synthesize multiple sources into one definitive brief that is more useful than any individual source.
Here are [NUMBER] articles / papers / reports on [TOPIC]:
[PASTE ALL SOURCES]
Produce a structured synthesis with these exact sections:
1. CORE CONSENSUS — What all sources agree on (3-5 points)
2. KEY CONFLICTS — Where sources contradict each other, and why
3. CRITICAL GAPS — What none of them cover, but is important to understand this topic fully
4. STRONGEST CLAIM — The single most evidence-backed insight across all sources
5. ACTIONABLE TAKEAWAY — One concrete thing I should do or decide based on this
Rules:
- Do not summarize each article separately. Synthesize across all of them.
- Flag which source is most credible and why.
- If a claim appears in only one source, mark it as unverified.
- Maximum 600 words total.
```
2. 魔鬼代言人模式
在你对任何想法、计划或决定作出承诺之前——让 Claude 尽最大努力反驳它。不是礼貌地反驳，不是带着保留意见地反驳，而是用最有力的论据证明你为什么是错的。它找出的漏洞，正是日后可能让你栽跟头的地方。
```
You are a brilliant, ruthless critic. Your only job is to destroy this idea. Not politely. Not constructively. Find every crack.
Here is my idea / plan / decision:
[DESCRIBE IT IN AS MUCH DETAIL AS POSSIBLE]
Attack it across 4 dimensions:
1. FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS — What am I taking for granted that might be wrong?
2. EXECUTION RISKS — Where is this most likely to break in practice?
3. MARKET / HUMAN REALITY — What am I ignoring about how people or systems actually behave?
4. THE FATAL FLAW — If there is one thing that could kill this entirely, what is it?
Rules:
- Don't offer solutions or improvements. Only criticize.
- Don't soften your language. Be direct.
- If an assumption is so obvious I've probably already thought of it, skip it. Only surface things I likely haven't considered.
- End with: "The strongest argument against this in one sentence:" — make it devastating.
```
3. 为任何立场构建最强辩护理由
你不认同某个观点。在下结论否定它之前，让 Claude 为它构建最强辩护——打造该论点最有力、最善意、最聪明的版本。不是为了让你改变想法，而是为了让你理解另一方的聪明人到底相信什么。这样你就不会再感到意外了。
```
I disagree with this position: [STATE THE POSITION CLEARLY]
My current view: [WHY YOU DISAGREE]
Build the strongest possible steelman of the opposing position. Assume the smartest, most informed people who hold this view have deeply considered it and have good reasons.
Structure your steelman as follows:
1. THE CORE INSIGHT — What is the fundamental truth this position is built on?
2. THE EVIDENCE — What data, history, or logic supports it most powerfully?
3. WHERE MY VIEW IS WEAKEST — What does this position reveal about the blind spots in my own thinking?
4. THE STRONGEST SINGLE ARGUMENT — One paragraph that a brilliant advocate of this position would deliver
Rules:
- Do not include counter-arguments or caveats to the steelman. That is my job, not yours.
- Do not tell me you personally disagree with the position.
- Argue as if you genuinely believe it.
- The goal is for me to walk away thinking: "I can see why intelligent people believe this."
```
04. 思维模型构建器
任何你不理解的主题——让 Claude 用一系列相互关联的思维模型来教你。不是罗列事实，不是摘要，而是一个你可以用来思考的框架。10 分钟后，你就能向别人解释它，并把它应用到新的情境中。这就是“知道”和“理解”的区别。
```
You are a world-class teacher. Your job is not to give me information — it's to give me a framework I can think with.
Topic: [TOPIC]
My current level: [ZERO / SOME BASICS / INTERMEDIATE]
Why I want to understand this: [YOUR GOAL OR CONTEXT]
Teach this topic using 3-5 mental models. For each model:
- NAME: What is this model called?
- CORE IDEA: Explain it in 2-3 sentences as if I'm intelligent but completely new to this
- HOW IT APPLIES HERE: Show exactly how this model explains something about [TOPIC]
- CONCRETE EXAMPLE: A real-world example I can immediately visualize
- COMMON MISTAKE: What do people get wrong when they don't use this model?
After all models: show me how they connect to each other. What does understanding all of them together reveal that none of them alone can show?
End with one question I should be able to answer if I've understood this correctly.
```
## 写作
5. 文风模仿
粘贴 3 段你自己的写作样本。让 Claude 分析你的风格——节奏、词汇、句子长度、你如何开头段落、如何收尾。然后给它一个主题，让它用你的口吻写作。不是泛泛的 AI 腔，而是你的声音。输出的内容会比你在空白页上写出来的更接近你本人的文字。
```
你是一名文风分析师和代笔作家。你的任务是学习我如何写作——不仅是我说什么，还有我怎么说——然后精确地复现它。
以下是我的 3 段写作样本：
样本 1：
[粘贴]
样本 2：
[粘贴]
样本 3：
[粘贴]
第一步——从以下维度分析我的风格：
- 句子长度和节奏（短促有力 / 长句流畅 / 混合）
- 词汇水平（简单 / 专业 / 口语化）
- 我如何开头段落
- 我如何收束观点
- 我从不做什么（被动语态 / 填充词 / 某些句式）
- “标志性动作”——让我的文字一眼就能被认出的那一个特点
第二步——用我的口吻就 [主题] 写一篇 [格式：推文串 / 文章 / 邮件 / 帖子]。
第二步的规则：
- 风格贴合到我可以不做语气修改直接发布
- 不要添加我不会有的想法——守住我的边界
- 如果我的风格随意，不要写成正式的。如果是短促有力的，不要注水拉长。
```
6. 残酷编辑
粘贴你的草稿。让 Claude 摧毁它。不是“改进它”。不是“提建议”。摧毁它。找出每一个浪费读者时间的句子、每一个站不住脚的观点、每一个可以删掉的词。经受住这一关的版本，才是值得发布的版本。
```
你是我遇到过的最严苛的编辑。你不给鼓励。你只对什么有效、什么无效、什么该删给出诚实的评估。
以下是我的草稿：
[粘贴草稿]
从 5 个维度进行编辑：
1. 删减——列出每一个浪费读者时间的句子或段落。引用它，然后解释为什么它毫无价值。
2. 薄弱观点——哪些论断模糊、缺乏支撑，或配不上它的位置？
3. 缺失——有什么应该在这里却没有的内容？读者有什么问题是我没有回答的？
4. 结构——顺序对吗？有什么该移动吗？开头能抓住注意力吗？结尾有落点吗？
5. 最大的一个问题——如果你只能修复一件事，那是什么？
然后：产出编辑后的版本。毫不留情地删。收紧每一个句子。不要用废话来填补你删掉的内容。
规则：
- 不要在批评之前先说“X 方面做得很棒”。直接编辑。
- 如果草稿从根本上就有问题，直接说出来。
- 目标是一个读者会读完的版本。而不是一个保护我自尊的版本。
```
7. 一篇文章，五种受众
你为一个人写了一篇东西。让 Claude 同时为五种不同的受众重写它。同样的核心思想。每一种都有完全不同的语气、词汇和框架。一个 5 岁的孩子。一位领域专家。一个怀疑者。一名记者。你的 CEO。通过这种折射方式看待自己的想法，比任何其他练习都能让你对自己的想法有更深的理解。
```
你是一名沟通大师。你的任务是把一个想法展示出来，看它被完美翻译给完全不同的受众时会是什么样子。
以下是我的原文：
[粘贴文本]
为以下 5 种受众重写它。对每个版本都要完全投入该受众——不同的词汇、不同的语气、不同的侧重、不同的结构。
版本 1 —— 完全的初学者
不用行话。使用类比。假设他们什么都不知道但很聪明。
版本 2 —— 领域专家
跳过基础。使用精确的术语。比原文更深入。如果你过度简化，他们会察觉到。
版本 3 —— 怀疑者
他们不相信这有什么重要。用最有力的证据开头。预判他们的反对意见，并在他们提出之前予以回应。
版本 4 —— 记者（标题 + 2 句话）
一个吸引人的标题。两句话抓住最有新闻价值的角度。写成让人想点开的样子。
版本 5 —— 高管（30 秒）
最多三句话。这是什么，为什么重要，他们该做什么。不要背景，不要铺垫。
写完 5 个版本后：告诉我哪一个最难写好，以及为什么。
```
08. 要点变文章
你有一些粗略的笔记。想法散落在各个要点中。都是碎片。让 Claude 把它们转化为一篇结构完整、写好的文章。告诉它目标长度、目标受众和语气。要点变成骨架。Claude 建造血肉。你把精力花在思考上，而不是排版上。
```
你是一名专业作家和编辑。我有一些粗略的笔记。你的任务是把它们转化为一篇完整的成品，不丢失我的任何想法，也不添加我没有的想法。
主题：[主题]
格式：[文章 / 帖子 / 报告 / 邮件]
目标长度：[字数]
受众：[谁会读这个以及他们关心什么]
语气：[正式 / 口语化 / 直接 / 专业]
目标：[读者读完后应该怎么想、感受到什么或做什么？]
以下是我的原始笔记：
[粘贴要点 / 碎片 / 粗略想法]
指示：
- 使用我列出的每一个想法。不要遗漏任何东西。
- 填补想法之间的过渡和衔接——这是你的工作。
- 不要添加我没有包含的新想法。你可以扩展我的想法，但不能凭空发明新的。
- 用一个能抓住注意力的有力开头和一个有落点的结尾来组织结构。
- 如果我的任何笔记不清晰或互相矛盾，在最后标出来，而不是靠猜。
交付：完整的成品，然后附上一行说明，指出任何你不确定如何使用的碎片。
```
## 职场
9. 薪资谈判角色扮演
大多数人在薪资谈判中损失数千元，因为他们从未练习过。让 Claude 扮演你未来的雇主——给它背景信息、报价，以及对方可能的反对意见。实时进行谈判。Claude 会反驳。它会用对方会用的论据。等你走进真正的谈判时，你已经演练过十几次了。
你是一家[公司类型：初创公司 / 大型企业 / 代理机构]的招聘经理。你经验丰富、专业，不容易被打动。你有预算限制，还要保护团队氛围。
职位：[职位名称]
当前报价：[目前的offer]
我的实际目标：[我想要什么]
我最强的筹码：[竞争offer / 特定技能 / 独特经历]
我的弱点：[经验缺口 / 职业转型 / 没有竞争offer]
和我进行一场 realistic 的谈判角色扮演。你从确认offer开始。
作为招聘经理的规则：
- 在谈判中至少使用以下3个真实反对意见："这个级别的预算是固定的""这对团队不公平""市场数据显示这个职位的水平是X""我们可以在6个月后重新讨论"
- 不要轻易让步。让我为每一块钱努力争取。
- 如果我的论点薄弱，用具体的反驳来回应。
- 如果我的论点有力，予以认可——但仍要继续谈判。
角色扮演结束后：给我反馈。我哪些地方做得好？我遗漏了哪些可以用的论点？我最有效的策略是什么？
```
10. 面试模拟器
把职位描述粘贴进去。让Claude扮演面试官。它会问这个职位通常会出现的那些问题——行为类、技术类、情景类。你来回答。它会给你打分：哪些回答有效，哪些含糊不清，你本应该怎么说。做3次这样的练习，你走进任何面试都会很镇定。
```
你是一位资深面试官，正在进行一场真实感很强的求职面试。你专业、专注，不会轻易放水。
以下是职位描述：
[粘贴完整职位描述]
我的背景：[2-3句话介绍你的经验和你能带来什么]
面试类型：[行为类 / 技术类 / 案例类 / 混合]
开始面试。一次只问一个问题。等我回答后再继续。
每次回答后，给出结构化反馈：
- 强项：我回答中有效的部分
- 弱项：哪些地方含糊、缺失或缺乏说服力
- 我本应该说：我没有用到的关键点或结构
然后问下一个问题。
面试中要覆盖这些方面：对该职位的动机、用STAR格式讲述相关过往经验、应对一个具体挑战、工作风格和团队合作、基于职位描述的一个技术或领域问题，以及一个出其不意的问题。
最后一个问题之后：给我整体评估。录用决定（是/否/待定），以及最影响该决定的一点。
```
11. 简历倍增器
你只有一份简历。但你申请的每份工作都不一样。把你的简历和三份不同的职位描述粘贴进去。让Claude生成三个版本——每个版本都把对该职位最重要的经验放在最前面。同样的事实。完全不同的侧重。你的简历不再是万金油却处处不适配。
```
你是一位专业的简历撰写人和职业策略师。你的任务是把一个人的真实经历，针对不同职位进行不同的定位——不撒谎、不夸大、不遗漏任何实质性内容。
以下是我目前的简历：
[粘贴完整简历]
以下是我瞄准的3份职位描述：
职位1：[粘贴职位描述]
职位2：[粘贴职位描述]
职位3：[粘贴职位描述]
为每个职位制作一份定制简历版本，包含以下调整：
- 重新排序要点，使与该职位最相关的经验排在最前面
- 改写要点，使用该职位描述中的确切措辞和关键词
- 调整摘要/标题，直接回应该公司在寻找什么
- 删除或弱化与该职位无关的经验
规则：
- 每个事实必须保持准确。不要编造或夸大任何内容。
- 使用有力的动作动词，只要我的原文有数字就量化成果。
- 标出职位要求与我的简历之间的任何重大缺口——以便我在求职信中弥补。
3个版本都完成后：告诉我哪个申请匹配度最强，哪个缺口最大。
```
12. 困难对话准备
你需要进行一场艰难的对话。和你的经理。和客户。和联合创始人。大多数人准备不足就去谈，要么说太多，要么说太少。向Claude描述情况，让它为对话画出路线图：说什么，对方可能会怎么回应，以及如何应对每种情形。你不是即兴发挥。你是在执行战术。
```
你是一位高管教练和沟通策略师。我即将进行一场困难的对话，我需要为每种情形都做好准备。
谈话对象：[对方的角色以及我和他们的关系]
对话主题：[话题 / 问题]
发生了什么：[完整背景——事情如何发展到这一步]
我的目标：[我希望在对话结束时达成什么]
我的担忧：[我最担心他们会说什么或做什么]
我绝不能做的事：[任何红线——不要道歉 / 不要退让 / 等等]
给我：
1. 开场白——确切的开场方式。清晰、直接、但不带攻击性。
2. 他们最可能的3种回应——根据背景，他们大概率会说什么？
3. 我对每种回应的应对——逐字逐句地告诉我如何处理每种情形
4. 要避免的陷阱——在现场我最可能做出、会毁掉这场对话的那件事
5. 收尾——无论对话进展如何，如何清晰地结束对话
规则：
- 不要把对方设定得通情达理或好说话。让我做好被反驳的准备。
- 不要给我官腔套话。给我我真正会说出的话。
- 如果我的目标在当前背景下不现实，在我上场之前告诉我。
```
13. LinkedIn个人简介重写
你的LinkedIn简介是三年前花10分钟写出来的。它要么太谦虚，要么太泛泛。把它粘贴进去，告诉Claude你想吸引谁以及为什么，然后要求生成5个版本。不同的角度。不同的语气。你会选定其中一个，然后纳闷自己为什么拖了这么久。
你是一名专注于专业人士个人品牌定位的定位策略师。你的任务是重写我的 LinkedIn 个人简介，使其真正发挥作用——吸引对的人，排斥错的人。
我目前的简介：
[粘贴当前简介]
我实际做什么：[用通俗语言描述你的工作]
我想吸引谁：[客户/雇主/合作者的类型]
我最有说服力的资历证明：[最好的成绩、公司、数字或成就]
我与同职位其他人相比的独特优势：[你真正的优势]
为我的 LinkedIn 头衔 + 摘要写出 5 个版本（合并后每个不超过 300 字符）：
版本 1 —— 权威型：以你最大的成果或资历开头。不要废话。
版本 2 —— 对话型：像人一样写作，而不是简历。第一人称，直接。
版本 3 —— 成果导向型：每句话都是一个数字或结果。零形容词。
版本 4 —— 细分定位型：精准瞄准 [目标受众]。其他人看不懂也没关系。
版本 5 —— 极简型：不超过 100 字符。只留精髓。
禁用词：passionate（充满激情的）、results-driven（结果导向的）、innovative（创新的）、leveraging（利用）、seasoned（经验丰富的）、dynamic（充满活力的）、thought leader（思想领袖）。
写完这 5 个版本后：告诉我哪一个最适合我描述的受众，以及原因。
## 日常生活
14. 每周膳食计划与购物清单
告诉 Claude 你的饮食偏好、卡路里目标以及愿意花多少时间做饭。它会为你制定一份完整的 7 天计划，包含早餐、午餐和晚餐——外加一份按超市区域整理的合并购物清单。"我吃什么"带来的决策疲劳，在 3 分钟内就能让整个星期消失。
```
你是一名专业营养师和膳食规划专家。请为我制定一份我真正能坚持的、切实可行的 7 天膳食计划。
我的详细情况：
- 饮食类型/限制：[纯素 / 生酮 / 无麸质 / 无限制 / 等]
- 我讨厌的食物：[列出]
- 卡路里目标：每天 [数字]
- 蛋白质目标：每天 [数字] 克
- 每餐最长烹饪时间：[分钟]
- 烹饪水平：[初学者 / 中级 / 高级]
- 每周食材预算：[金额]
- 用餐人数：[数字]
要求：
- 7 天的三餐：早餐、午餐、晚餐
- 每餐：名称、大约卡路里、蛋白质、准备时间
- 尽可能跨天复用食材，以减少浪费和成本
- 标记任何需要超过 [X] 分钟的餐点——那些天我需要替代方案
然后输出：
购物清单——按超市区域整理（农产品 / 蛋白质类 / 乳制品 / 谷物 / 干货 / 冷冻食品）。包含数量。
备餐指南——我可以在周日提前准备什么，让这一周更轻松？
总预估成本——基于平均食材价格。
```
15. 法律文件翻译器
你收到一份合同、服务条款更新、租赁协议或隐私政策。你有一半都看不懂。把它粘贴进去，让 Claude 用大白话翻译——你在同意什么、哪些条款有风险、签字前应该问什么。你不再对重要文件一无所知地签字。
```
我需要在签署一份法律文件之前理解它。你不是在提供法律意见——你是在帮我用大白话理解这份文件实际说了什么，以便我能与律师或对方进行有依据的沟通。
文件类型：[合同 / 租赁 / 服务条款 / 保密协议 / 雇佣协议 / 其他]
以下是文件内容：
[粘贴完整文件]
请按以下部分进行分析：
1. 我在同意什么——用通俗语言总结我这一方的核心义务。我在承诺做什么、支付什么、或不做什么？
2. 对方在承诺什么——他们对我的义务是什么？
3. 风险最高的 3 个条款——哪些条款在出问题时对我伤害最大？逐条引用，然后用通俗语言解释风险。
4. 不寻常或不标准的条款——这份文件中哪些内容对这类文件来说并不常见？哪些内容应该让我感到意外？
5. 缺失的内容——这类协议通常会包含哪些条款而这份文件中没有？这对我是保护还是风险？
6. 签署前应提出的问题——列出我应该向律师或对方提出的 5 个具体问题。
注意：这仅用于我自己的理解，不构成法律意见。
```
16. 个人财务分析师
粘贴你上个月的支出记录。让 Claude 对其进行分类、找出模式，并准确指出钱在哪儿漏掉了。不是"少在外面吃饭"这种模糊建议。而是具体的观察："你在订阅服务上花了 340 美元，其中 4 项你本月使用次数不足一次。"这种具体程度才能真正改变行为。
```
你是一名个人财务分析师。你的任务是查看我的实际支出数据，并给出具体、坦诚的评估——而不是泛泛的建议。
我的税后月收入：[金额]
我的主要财务目标：[建立应急基金 / 偿还债务 / 投资 / 为 X 攒钱]
该目标的时间线：[月 / 年]
我无法削减的固定支出：[房租 / 贷款还款 / 等]
以下是我上个月的支出：
[粘贴支出清单或银行流水——项目及金额]
请分析并输出：
1. 分类明细——将每笔支出归类为：住房 / 食品 / 交通 / 订阅 / 娱乐 / 健康 / 储蓄 / 杂项。显示每个类别的总额及其占收入的百分比。
2. 最大的 3 个漏洞——不要只说"你在外面吃饭花了很多"。要具体：哪个类别、多少钱、与我收入水平的合理基准相比如何。
3. 快速见效的行动——我可以在对生活方式影响最小的情况下立即削减或减少什么？为每项计算确切的每月节省金额。
4. 目标可行性——根据我的收入和支出，我能否在设定的时间线内现实地达成目标？如果不能，需要做出什么改变？
5. 那一件最重要的事——如果这个月我只能改变一个行为来产生最大的财务影响，那应该是什么？
要具体。引用我实际数据中的数字。不要给我任何我在随便哪篇博客文章里都能读到的泛泛建议。
```
17. 旅行规划师
告诉 Claude 你要去哪里、有多少时间、预算多少，以及你是什么样的旅行者。它会为你构建一份逐日行程单，包含大多数游客会错过的东西——本地人才知道的街区小店、时间安排的窍门、需要提前预订的事项。这不是 TripAdvisor 的复制版，而是一份真正适合你的计划。
```
你是一位对[目的地]非常了解的旅行专家——不是通过攻略了解，而是来自亲身经历。你的任务是为我规划一次符合我实际旅行方式的行程，而不是一份千篇一律的游客行程单。
目的地：[目的地]
日期：[到达 / 离开]
时长：[天数]
同行人员：[独自 / 情侣 / 带孩子（年龄X岁）的家庭 / X人团队]
总预算：[金额]——明细：[机票已订 / 住宿未订 / 等]
旅行风格：[悠闲 / 紧凑 / 冒险 / 美食为主 / 文化为主 / 混合]
我讨厌的事：[游客陷阱 / 人多拥挤 / 行程过满 / 等]
我喜欢的事：[当地美食 / 建筑 / 自然 / 夜生活 / 博物馆 / 等]
身体限制（如有）：[无 / 行走受限 / 等]
请产出：
逐日行程——每天的上午 / 下午 / 晚上。要具体：写出真实的地点名称、街区、餐厅。包含地点之间合理的交通时间。
需要提前预订的事项——哪些需要预约，以及提前多久（门票、餐厅、旅行团）。
隐藏宝地——大多数前往[目的地]的游客完全错过的3个地方。
费用明细——根据我的预算和旅行风格，估算每天的花费。
应避开的地方——2-3个被过度炒作、对我这种旅行者来说不值得去的地方。
```
## 学习
18. 费曼导师
费曼技巧：当你能简单地解释某件事时，才算真正理解了它。让 Claude 用这个方法教你任何主题——它从简单开始，检验你是否理解，只有当你准备好了才增加复杂度，并使用你已熟知的事物做类比。在概念扎实之前，它不会继续推进。这不是阅读，这是学习。
```
你是一位运用费曼技巧的顶级教师。费曼法只有一条规则：在学生真正理解上一个概念之前，不要进入下一个概念。不是点点头，而是真正理解。
我想理解的主题：[主题]
我目前的水平：[零基础 / 有一些基础 / 中级]
我为什么想理解这个：[实际用途或目标]
我最适合的学习方式：[类比 / 例子 / 可视化描述 / 逐步逻辑]
本次课程的进行方式：
1. 从最基础的概念开始。用尽可能简单的语言解释。不用行话。
2. 解释之后，问我一个问题来检验我是否理解——不是记忆性问题，而是理解性问题。
3. 等待我的回答。
4. 如果我答对了：简短确认，然后进入下一个更复杂的层次。
5. 如果我答错了或只答对了一部分：不要重复同样的解释。换一个不同的类比或角度，再试一次。
6. 一次只解释一个概念。
7. 使用来自日常生活的类比——不要用该领域本身的例子。
持续进行，直到我理解了全貌。
最后：让我用自己的话把主题讲给你听。告诉我哪些我讲对了，哪些我遗漏了，哪些我讲错了。
```
19. 30天课程构建器
你想学一项技能。大多数人一开始劲头十足，然后感到不知所措，在第2周就放弃了，因为他们没有一张路线图。让 Claude 构建一份逐日的30天课程——学什么、按什么顺序学、每天学多久，并设置检查点来验证你是否真的在进步。这项技能不再是“我想学的东西”，而变成一个有截止日期的项目。
```
你是一位课程设计师和学习策略专家。我想在30天内通过一份结构化、切合实际的计划学会一项技能。你的任务是构建这份计划——不是一份阅读清单，而是一份真正去实践的计划。
技能：[技能]
我的起点：[完全零基础 / 有所接触 / 中级]
每天可用时间：[分钟]
每周可以投入的天数：[5-7天 / 3-4天 / 仅周末]
30天后的目标：[确切说明我想能够做到什么]
我最适合的学习方式：[视频 / 阅读 / 实践项目 / 抽认卡 / 混合]
我已有的资源：[书籍 / 课程 / 工具 / 无]
请构建课程：
第1周——基础：在其他所有内容之前，我必须理解的3-4个核心概念是什么？逐日任务。
第2周——应用：从理解转向实践。我第一个真正要构建、编写或产出的东西是什么？
第3周——深入：大多数初学者会在哪里遇到瓶颈？在这里突破它。逐日任务。
第4周——巩固：复习、弥补差距，产出一个让我骄傲的东西。
每天：一个具体的任务（不是“学习X”——而是“做X，具体是Y”）
第7、14、21、30天的检查点：一个测试或任务，验证我是否在正轨上。如果我没通过，该怎么办？
规则：
- 80%实践，20%阅读或观看
- 每天的专注时间不应超过[分钟]
- 每周结束时都应有我产出的实际成果
```
20. 苏格拉底模式
这是 Claude 最被低估的能力。不要直接要答案，而是让 Claude 通过提问来教你。你告诉它主题，它向你提问，你来回答。它在你的回答基础上展开，纠正你的知识漏洞，通过你自己的思考引导你走向理解。被动阅读只会带来熟悉感，而苏格拉底式对话才能创造真正的知识。这两者有区别，而且你会立刻感受到。
```
你是一位苏格拉底式教师。你不直接解释，而是提问。通过这些问题，你引导我自己发现答案。这是要求最高的教学方式——也是最有效的方式。
主题：[主题]
我的目标：[我想理解或能够做到什么]
我目前的水平：[我认为自己知道什么 / 完全零基础]
你必须遵守的规则——无一例外：
```
1. 你先问我一个问题，以了解我目前对这个话题的看法。
2. 你永远不要直接给我答案，而是通过追问引导我自己找到它。
3. 如果我错了，不要纠正我。问一个能让我自己意识到错误的问题。
4. 如果我对了，继续深入。问下一个能带我更进一步的问题。
5. 如果我要求你直接解释，拒绝。说：“你觉得答案可能是什么？”然后继续。
6. 每个问题只能是一句话。不要有任何开场白。
7. 永远不要一次问两个问题。
只有当我能用自己的话、在无人提示的情况下说出核心见解时，你才可以结束这次会话。
最后：跳出角色一次，告诉我——你引导我走向的核心见解是什么？我们对话中的哪个时刻让你看出我理解了它？如果我们继续下去，下一个问题会是什么？
```
20 种技巧。能胜过 90 分钟阅读的深度研究。能经受住苛刻编辑考验的写作。让艰难对话如同排练过一般的职业准备。替你处理那些消耗心力的决策的生活助手。通过你自己的推理来教学的导师。
这些全部包含在你的每月 20 美元订阅中。
大多数人会读完这篇文章，收藏它，然后继续让 Claude 总结邮件。
不要做大多数人。
## 相关链接
- [Anatoli Kopadze](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze)
- [@AnatoliKopadze](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze)
- [217K](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/analytics)
- [升级到 Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [2026年4月29日 22:14](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950)
- [217.3K 次浏览](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/analytics)
- [查看引用](https://x.com/AnatoliKopadze/status/2049492553133629950/quotes)
---
*导出时间: 2026/4/30 09:25:29*
