# 35 KILLER Claude Prompts That Do The Work For You (steal these)
**作者**: Corey Ganim
**日期**: 2026-04-30T13:07:17.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
---
This is your Claude prompt Bible. The prompts included here allow Claude to stop being a search engine replacement and start being a thinking tool that takes your business to a new level.
I've spent the last 6 months testing prompts across my workflows: business strategy, content creation, automation, and research.
Here are 35 of my most valuable, battle-tested prompts.
Copy/paste them into Claude and see what happens.
Bookmark this article. Come back to it when you need a productivity boost.
PS: Every week I send an email with tools, prompts, and automations designed to turn AI into ROI in your business.
Sign up for the (free) weekly email here.
# Strategy & Analysis (10 Prompts)
These prompts help you think through problems more clearly than you could alone. They're for the decisions that actually matter.
## 1. Business Model Validation
```
I'm considering launching [BUSINESS_IDEA]. Here's what I know:
- Target customer: [DESCRIPTION]
- Problem they have: [PROBLEM]
- Proposed solution: [SOLUTION]
- Current market alternatives: [ALTERNATIVES]
- My unfair advantage: [ADVANTAGE]
Analyze this business model. For each of these, give me:
1. Three specific risks I haven't thought of
2. One assumption I should validate FIRST before building anything
3. A revenue model that makes sense given my advantages
4. The most likely way this fails in year 1
5. One thing I should double-down on
Format as: [Risk] → [Why] → [How to mitigate]
```
Why this works: It forces you to articulate what you actually know vs. what you're guessing. Claude catches the gaps.
## 2. Competitive Differentiation Matrix
```
I'm competing in [MARKET]. My competitors are:
- [COMPETITOR A]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR B]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR C]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
My business: [YOUR_DESCRIPTION]
Create a 5x5 matrix comparing: Price, Quality, Speed, Customer Support, Innovation
Then tell me:
1. Where am I winning?
2. Where am I vulnerable?
3. One position I could own that nobody else is competing for?
4. The one feature/service that would make me unbeatable?
```
Why this works: Competitive analysis done wrong is just noise. This forces comparison across the same dimensions.
## 3. Decision Matrix for High-Stakes Choices
```
I need to choose between [OPTION_A] and [OPTION_B].
Here's what I know about each:
OPTION A:
- Upside: [UPSIDE]
- Downside: [DOWNSIDE]
- Time commitment: [TIME]
- Financial cost: [COST]
- Reversibility: [CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
OPTION B:
- Upside: [UPSIDE]
- Downside: [DOWNSIDE]
- Time commitment: [TIME]
- Financial cost: [COST]
- Reversibility: [CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
My priorities: [PRIORITY_1], [PRIORITY_2], [PRIORITY_3]
Build a decision framework that ranks these options using my priorities. What's my move?
```
Why this works: When you have competing priorities, ranking by gut feeling fails. This structures it.
## 4. Go/No-Go Project Evaluation
```
Project name: [PROJECT_NAME]
Goal: [GOAL]
Resources required: [TIME/MONEY/PEOPLE]
Timeline: [START_DATE] to [END_DATE]
Success metric: [HOW_YOU'LL_KNOW_IT_WORKED]
Current context:
- My bandwidth: [YOUR_CAPACITY]
- Strategic fit: [HOW_IT_ALIGNS]
- Opportunity cost: [WHAT_YOU_GIVE_UP]
As a decision advisor, should I start this project NOW, DELAY it, or KILL it? Give me:
1. Your recommendation with confidence level (0-100%)
2. Three hidden costs nobody mentions
3. One question I should ask before deciding
```
Why this works: Most projects fail because they were never worth starting. This helps you say no.
## 5. Revenue Bottleneck Analysis
```
I'm making [CURRENT_REVENUE] with [NUMBER_OF_CLIENTS].
My unit economics:
- Average deal size: [ADS]
- Sales cycle length: [CYCLE]
- Close rate: [RATE]
- Customer acquisition cost: [CAC]
- Customer lifetime value: [LTV]
To reach [TARGET_REVENUE], I need to:
1. Increase deal size by X%
2. Decrease sales cycle by Y days
3. Improve close rate by Z%
4. Add more clients by N%
Which of these four levers is the highest-impact move I can make in the next 90 days?
```
Why this works: Revenue doesn't grow evenly. There's always one lever that matters most. This finds it.
## 6. Customer Feedback Pattern Analysis
```
Here's feedback from [X] customers this month:
[PASTE FEEDBACK]
Analyze this. For each pattern you see:
1. Name the pattern
2. How many customers mentioned it
3. Why it matters for my business
4. Specific action I should take
Then rank them: Most important to act on vs. Nice to have
```
Why this works: Feedback without analysis is just noise. Claude spots the themes you miss.
## 7. Pricing Strategy Stress Test
```
I'm currently charging [PRICE] for [OFFER].
My costs: [COSTS]
My value to the customer: [VALUE]
Market average: [MARKET_PRICE]
Customer acquisition cost: [CAC]
I'm considering raising to [NEW_PRICE].
Tell me:
1. Will I lose customers? What's the risk?
2. Will I make more money even with lower volume?
3. What's my "nuclear option" if this backfires?
4. What should I say to customers about the increase?
5. One position/angle that justifies this price to skeptics?
```
Why this works: Pricing is psychology + math. This gets both right.
## 8. Team Scaling Analysis
```
My current team:
- [PERSON A]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON B]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON C]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
My current output: [OUTPUT]
Target output: [TARGET]
Timeline: [WHEN]
What's the fastest path to hit my target? Should I:
1. Hire someone new?
2. Train existing people?
3. Restructure roles?
4. Delegate differently?
5. Use automation?
Give me a 90-day roadmap.
```
Why this works: Team scaling fails when you don't diagnose the real bottleneck. This does.
## 9. Product-Market Fit Validator
```
My product: [DESCRIPTION]
My target customer: [DESCRIPTION]
Current traction: [CURRENT_METRICS]
Signals that suggest product-market fit:
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
Signals that suggest we DON'T have it yet:
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
Based on this, how close am I? What's the ONE thing I should test next?
```
Why this works: Product-market fit is a feeling, not a fact. This validates which feeling you should trust.
## 10. Strategic Pivot Scenario Analysis
```
I'm considering pivoting from [CURRENT] to [PROPOSED].
Why: [REASON]
Risk: [RISK]
Resources I'd need: [RESOURCES]
Model this scenario:
1. If I pivot and it works, where am I in 12 months?
2. If I pivot and it fails, what have I lost?
3. If I don't pivot but my competitor does, where are they?
4. What's the reversibility? Can I go back if it doesn't work?
5. The ONE metric that tells me to pivot vs. stay?
```
Why this works: Pivots are scary because the downside feels infinite. This makes it concrete.
# Marketing & Content (10 Prompts)
These prompts help you create content that actually converts instead of just getting views.
## 11. Hook Generator for Ad Copy
```
Product: [PRODUCT_NAME]
What it does: [WHAT]
Benefit to customer: [BENEFIT]
Target person: [WHO]
Generate 10 different opening lines (hooks) for ad copy. Each hook should:
- Create curiosity or discomfort
- Be specific (not vague)
- Make someone stop scrolling
- Be 5-12 words max
Format: "Hook text" - [Why it works]
```
Why this works: 80% of conversions happen in the first line. These are production-ready.
## 12. Email Subject Line A/B Test Generator
```
Campaign goal: [GOAL]
Offer: [OFFER]
Target audience: [AUDIENCE]
Email body preview: [PREVIEW]
Generate 8 email subject lines. For each, tell me:
1. The psychology behind it (curiosity gap, urgency, specificity, etc.)
2. Estimated open rate increase vs. baseline
Split them into two groups:
GROUP A: Conservative (high probability of open, less risky)
GROUP B: Aggressive (curiosity/urgency focused, higher variance)
Which 2 should I A/B test first?
```
Why this works: Subject lines make or break email campaigns. This gives you tested patterns.
## 13. Product Description Copy (Benefits Focus)
```
Product name: [NAME]
Feature list: [FEATURES]
Who buys this: [CUSTOMER]
Their main problem: [PROBLEM]
Price: [PRICE]
Write a 150-word product description that:
- Leads with the biggest benefit (not the feature)
- Includes ONE specific number or example
- Addresses the most common objection
- Ends with a clear next step
Format: [Description] - [Why this version converts]
```
Why this works: Features don't sell. Benefits do. This flips the script.
## 14. LinkedIn Article Title Generator
```
Topic: [TOPIC]
Main takeaway: [TAKEAWAY]
Your unique angle: [ANGLE]
Target audience: [AUDIENCE]
Generate 12 LinkedIn article titles. For each, score it on:
- Shareability (0-10)
- Click probability (0-10)
- Credibility (0-10)
Give me the top 3 that balance all three.
```
Why this works: LinkedIn rewards specific, bold titles. These formulas work.
## 15. Sales Page Section Outline
```
Product: [PRODUCT]
Ideal customer: [CUSTOMER]
Price: [PRICE]
Offer: [OFFER]
Create a sales page structure with these sections:
1. Headline + subheadline
2. [YOUR SECTIONS]
3. CTA + urgency element
For each section, write:
- The section name
- The purpose (what it does)
- 3 bullet points of content
- The psychological principle at work
```
Why this works: Sales pages fail because they're not structured. This gives you the blueprint.
## 16. Content Repurposing Framework
```
Original content: [CONTENT_TYPE] - [TOPIC]
Length: [LENGTH]
Original audience: [AUDIENCE]
I want to repurpose this into:
- [FORMAT_1]
- [FORMAT_2]
- [FORMAT_3]
For each format, tell me:
1. What to keep from the original
2. What to cut or condense
3. What to add or expand
4. Best platform to publish it
5. Estimated time to adapt
```
Why this works: Every piece of content can become 5 pieces. This shows you how.
## 17. Competitor Content Analysis
```
Competitor: [NAME]
Their top 3 recent posts:
- [POST_1]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_2]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_3]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
Analyze:
1. What's working for them? Why?
2. What pattern do you see across their top posts?
3. What angle are they NOT covering?
4. How could I own the gap they're leaving?
Give me 3 content ideas that differentiate me from them.
```
Why this works: The best content doesn't follow trends, it creates them in gaps.
## 18. Call-to-Action Optimizer
```
Current CTA: [CURRENT_CTA]
Current conversion rate: [RATE]
Offer: [OFFER]
Objection: [MAIN_OBJECTION]
Generate 8 different CTAs that address the objection while increasing urgency.
Rank them by:
- Clarity (0-10)
- Urgency (0-10)
- Credibility (0-10)
Give me the top 3 alternatives to test.
```
Why this works: CTA can 2-3x conversions with one word change. These work.
## 19. Launch Plan Content Calendar
```
Launch date: [DATE]
Product: [PRODUCT]
Launch phases: [PHASES]
Audience channels: [CHANNELS]
Build me a 30-day content calendar:
- Pre-launch (7 days before)
- Launch week
- Post-launch (14 days after)
For each day:
- What to publish
- Which channel
- Purpose (awareness, credibility, urgency, etc.)
- Key message
```
Why this works: Launches fail without a content plan. This provides it.
## 20. Customer Success Story Framework
```
Customer: [NAME]
Their situation before: [BEFORE]
What they used: [SOLUTION]
Result after: [AFTER]
Timeline: [HOW_LONG]
Create a 300-word case study that:
- Opens with their biggest pain
- Explains what changed
- Shows the quantified result
- Includes 1 quote from them
- Ends with how others can replicate it
Format for: Website + LinkedIn + Email
```
Why this works: Stories convert 10x better than claims. This structures them right.
# Productivity & Personal (10 Prompts)
These are for getting things done, not just thinking about getting things done.
## 21. Weekly Review Framework
```
This week I:
- Accomplished: [WINS]
- Failed to complete: [INCOMPLETE]
- Learned: [LEARNINGS]
- Spent time on: [TIME_BREAKDOWN]
For next week, I need to:
[GOALS]
Analyze:
1. Where did time actually go vs. where I planned it?
2. What's the ONE thing that would make next week 10x more productive?
3. What should I eliminate entirely?
4. What patterns do you see in my performance?
Give me 3 specific changes for next week.
```
Why this works: Weekly reviews are routine. This makes them actually useful.
## 22. Priority Filter for Decision Fatigue
```
I have these things competing for my time this week:
- [TASK_A]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_B]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_C]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_D]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_E]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
My constraints:
- Available hours: [HOURS]
- Peak energy time: [WHEN]
- Non-negotiables: [FIXED_COMMITMENTS]
Rank these by: Impact per hour spent. Then build my ideal week with start/end times for each task.
```
Why this works: When you have too many tasks, you paralyzed. This unparalyzed you.
## 23. Habit Formation Roadmap
```
Habit I want: [HABIT]
Why I want it: [WHY]
Current attempts: [ATTEMPTS_AND_FAILURES]
Current blocker: [WHAT_STOPS_YOU]
Design me a habit formation plan:
1. Break the habit into the smallest possible first step
2. Stack it onto a habit I already do
3. What's the specific trigger?
4. What's the reward?
5. How do I track it?
6. When do I increase difficulty?
7. What's my backup plan when I miss a day?
```
Why this works: Most habits fail because the first step is too big. This makes it tiny.
## 24. Email Triage System
```
My email volume: [DAILY_COUNT]
Categories that come in: [CATEGORIES]
Current system: [CURRENT_SYSTEM]
Problem: [PROBLEM]
Design an email system that:
1. Takes less than 30 minutes daily to process
2. Doesn't let important things fall through
3. Separates urgent from important
4. Automates low-value email
Give me:
- Filter rules (if-then statements)
- Folder structure
- Processing time blocks
- Escalation rules
```
Why this works: Email is a productivity killer until you triage it right.
## 25. Deep Work Schedule Optimizer
```
My ideal deep work session: [LENGTH] hours
My energy pattern: [PEAK_TIMES]
My meetings: [FIXED_MEETINGS]
My distractions: [MAIN_DISTRACTIONS]
Build me a weekly schedule that:
- Protects [X] hours of uninterrupted deep work
- Batches all meetings into [NUMBER] days
- Creates transition buffers
- Includes breaks
Show me:
- Exact time blocks
- How to communicate these to my team
- What to do during low-energy time
- Backup schedule if things change
```
Why this works: Deep work requires schedule protection, not willpower.
## 26. Decision Journal Template
```
Decision: [WHAT_YOU'RE_DECIDING]
Date: [TODAY]
Deadline: [WHEN_YOU_NEED_ANSWER]
Before deciding, record:
- What I think will happen: [PREDICTION]
- Why I think that: [REASONING]
- Confidence level: [0-100%]
- Decision: [WHAT_I'M_DOING]
Create a template I can use to track:
1. What I predicted
2. What actually happened
3. Why the gap exists
4. What I learned for next time
Example template with 3 sample entries from my past decisions.
```
Why this works: Decision journals make you better at predicting over time.
## 27. Saying "No" Response Templates
```
Common requests I get:
- [REQUEST_TYPE_1]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_2]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_3]
Create 3 different "no" templates:
1. The warm no (keeps relationship)
2. The firm no (clear boundary)
3. The redirect no (offer alternative)
For each:
- Use case
- Full script (copy-paste ready)
- Why it works
- When to use which one
```
Why this works: Saying no is hard until you have a script.
## 28. Meeting Agenda Template
```
Meeting purpose: [PURPOSE]
Attendees: [WHO]
Duration: [MINUTES]
Goal: [WHAT_SUCCESS_LOOKS_LIKE]
Create an agenda template that:
- Opens with the goal (1 minute)
- Lists discussion topics with time allocations
- Includes decision points
- Closes with clear next steps and owners
Then give me:
- Instructions for the agenda-setter
- Instructions for attendees
- How to stay on time
- How to document decisions
```
Why this works: Agendas prevent meetings from becoming noise.
## 29. Energy Management Schedule
```
My energy pattern across a week:
- Morning: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Midday: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Afternoon: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Evening: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
High-energy activities I can do: [ACTIVITIES]
Low-energy activities I must do: [ACTIVITIES]
Design a week where:
1. High-impact work happens during peak energy
2. Admin/low-value work happens during low energy
3. I take breaks BEFORE energy crashes
4. I finish each day with momentum for the next day
Show me the week structure with activities assigned.
```
Why this works: Most productivity systems ignore energy. This doesn't.
## 30. Personal Quarterly Review
```
Last quarter I:
- Goals set: [GOALS]
- Goals completed: [COMPLETED]
- Surprises: [UNEXPECTED]
- Regrets: [WHAT_I'D_CHANGE]
- Growth: [HOW_I_GREW]
For next quarter:
- Keep doing: [KEEP]
- Stop doing: [STOP]
- Start doing: [START]
Give me:
1. 3 goals that are ambitious but achievable
2. The ONE habit that would make everything else easier
3. My personal development focus
4. How I'll measure success
```
Why this works: Most people don't review progress. Reviewing changes everything.
# Research & Data (5 Prompts)
When you need information quickly and structured.
## 31. Competitor Intelligence Summary
```
Company: [COMPANY_NAME]
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Why I care: [WHY]
Give me:
1. Business model (how they make money)
2. Main product/service
3. Recent funding/news
4. Their competitive advantages
5. Known weaknesses
6. Their likely next move
Format: [Bullet points for quick scanning]
```
Why this works: Competitor research without analysis is just facts. This gives you insight.
## 32. Industry Trend Analysis
```
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Timeframe: [YEARS]
My interest: [WHY]
Summarize the major shifts in:
1. Customer behavior
2. Technology adoption
3. Regulatory changes
4. Competitive landscape
5. Pricing models
For each trend:
- What's changing
- Why it matters
- Opportunities I should notice
- Timeline for when it matters
```
Why this works: Trends matter less than understanding which ones affect you.
## 33. Market Size Estimation
```
Market: [MARKET]
Customer: [WHO_BUYS]
Price point: [TYPICAL_PRICE]
Geographic focus: [WHERE]
Help me estimate:
1. Total addressable market (TAM)
2. Serviceable addressable market (SAM)
3. Serviceable obtainable market (SOM)
For each:
- Your methodology
- Key assumptions
- Range of estimates
- Confidence level
- What would change the estimate
```
Why this works: Market sizing is part art, part science. This guides both.
## 34. Benchmark Research Compilation
```
Benchmark category: [CATEGORY]
Metric: [METRIC]
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Company size: [SIZE]
Find me:
1. Industry average
2. Top quartile (where the winners are)
3. Bottom quartile (what underperforming looks like)
4. Median
5. Trend over time (if available)
For each number:
- Source (if you know it)
- Sample size (if known)
- How it's calculated
- Why it matters for my business
```
Why this works: Benchmarks give you context. Without context, metrics are meaningless.
## 35. Expert Research Synthesis
```
Topic: [TOPIC]
Question: [WHAT_YOU_WANT_TO_KNOW]
Perspective: [WHOSE_VIEW_MATTERS]
Synthesize research on this topic by:
1. Main schools of thought (if they disagree)
2. The most credible voices on this
3. What the data actually shows
4. Common misconceptions
5. What's still uncertain/debated
6. Practical application for my situation
Format: [Executive summary at top, then detailed breakdown]
```
Why this works: Research without synthesis is just noise. This makes it useful.
# How to Actually Use These
These prompts work because they're specific. But here's the thing: Claude is better than these prompts. If you use them as templates and adapt them to your exact situation, they become 10x more powerful.
Step 1: Copy a prompt that matches your situation.
Step 2: Fill in the [BRACKETS] with your actual information.
Step 3: Paste into Claude and hit send.
Step 4: Use the output as a starting point, not a finished answer.
The prompt isn't the intelligence. You are. The prompt just structures your thinking so Claude can help you think clearer.
# Key Takeaways
- Strategy prompts force you to articulate what you actually know vs. guessing
- Content prompts turn gut feeling into frameworks that work
- Productivity prompts protect your time instead of just managing it
- Research prompts turn information into insight
- All of these are templates. Adapt them to your situation for better results
- Claude is a thinking tool, not an answer machine. Use these to think clearer, faster
Start with one prompt in each category. Use it weekly. Watch your decision-making get faster and better.
PS: Every week I send an email with tools, prompts, and automations designed to turn AI into ROI in your business.
Sign up for the (free) weekly email here.
## 相关链接
- [Corey Ganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [@coreyganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [8.2K](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [Upgrade to Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [9:07 PM · Apr 30, 2026](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
- [8,224 Views](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [View quotes](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/quotes)
---
*导出时间: 2026/5/1 12:32:30*
---
## 中文翻译
# 35 个为你代劳的杀手级 Claude 提示词（拿去用）
**作者**: Corey Ganim
**日期**: 2026-04-30T13:07:17.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
---
这就是你的 Claude 提示词“圣经”。这里包含的提示词能让 Claude 不再只是一个搜索引擎的替代品，而是开始成为一个能将你的业务提升到新层次的思维工具。
在过去的 6 个月里，我在我的工作流程中测试了各种提示词：商业策略、内容创作、自动化和研究。
这里有 35 个我认为最有价值、经过实战检验的提示词。
将它们复制/粘贴到 Claude 中，看看会发生什么。
收藏这篇文章。当你需要提升生产力时，可以回来看看。
PS：每周我都会发送一封电子邮件，其中包含旨在将 AI 转化为你的业务投资回报率（ROI）的工具、提示词和自动化方案。
在此注册（免费）每周邮件。
# 策略与分析（10 个提示词）
这些提示词能帮助你比独自思考更清晰地梳理问题。它们用于那些真正重要的决策。
## 1. 商业模式验证
```
我正在考虑推出 [BUSINESS_IDEA]。这是我所知道的：
- 目标客户：[DESCRIPTION]
- 他们的问题：[PROBLEM]
- 提出的解决方案：[SOLUTION]
- 目前的市场替代方案：[ALTERNATIVES]
- 我的非对称优势：[ADVANTAGE]
分析这个商业模式。对于每一个方面，给我：
1. 我没想过的三个具体风险
2. 在构建任何东西之前我应该首先验证的一个假设
3. 考虑到我的优势，一个合理的收入模型
4. 第一年最可能的失败方式
5. 我应该加倍投入做的一件事
格式为：[风险] → [原因] → [如何缓解]
```
**为什么有效**：它迫使你阐明你实际上知道什么和你正在猜测什么。Claude 会发现其中的差距。
## 2. 竞争差异化矩阵
```
我在 [MARKET] 市场竞争。我的竞争对手是：
- [COMPETITOR A]：[KEY_STRENGTH]，[KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR B]：[KEY_STRENGTH]，[KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR C]：[KEY_STRENGTH]，[KEY_WEAKNESS]
我的业务：[YOUR_DESCRIPTION]
创建一个 5x5 矩阵来比较：价格、质量、速度、客户支持、创新
然后告诉我：
1. 我在哪里赢了？
2. 我在哪里很脆弱？
3. 有没有一个我可以占据且没有其他人竞争的位置？
4. 哪一个功能/服务能让我变得无懈可击？
```
**为什么有效**：错误的竞争分析只是噪音。这迫使你在相同的维度上进行比较。
## 3. 高风险决策矩阵
```
我需要在 [OPTION_A] 和 [OPTION_B] 之间做出选择。
这是我对每个选项的了解：
选项 A：
- 上行空间：[UPSIDE]
- 下行风险：[DOWNSIDE]
- 时间投入：[TIME]
- 财务成本：[COST]
- 可逆性：[CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
选项 B：
- 上行空间：[UPSIDE]
- 下行风险：[DOWNSIDE]
- 时间投入：[TIME]
- 财务成本：[COST]
- 可逆性：[CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
我的优先级：[PRIORITY_1]，[PRIORITY_2]，[PRIORITY_3]
建立一个决策框架，利用我的优先级对这些选项进行排名。我该怎么做？
```
**为什么有效**：当你有相互竞争的优先级时，靠直觉排名会失败。这会将其结构化。
## 4. 上马/下马项目评估
```
项目名称：[PROJECT_NAME]
目标：[GOAL]
所需资源：[TIME/MONEY/PEOPLE]
时间表：[START_DATE] 至 [END_DATE]
成功指标：[HOW_YOU'LL_KNOW_IT_WORKED]
当前背景：
- 我的带宽：[YOUR_CAPACITY]
- 战略契合度：[HOW_IT_ALIGNS]
- 机会成本：[WHAT_YOU_GIVE_UP]
作为一个决策顾问，我应该现在启动这个项目、推迟它，还是扼杀它？给我：
1. 你的建议及置信度（0-100%）
2. 三个没人提到的隐性成本
3. 我在决定前应该问的一个问题
```
**为什么有效**：大多数项目失败是因为它们从一开始就不值得启动。这帮助你学会拒绝。
## 5. 收入瓶颈分析
```
我目前拥有 [NUMBER_OF_CLIENTS] 个客户，收入为 [CURRENT_REVENUE]。
我的单体经济模型：
- 平均交易规模：[ADS]
- 销售周期长度：[CYCLE]
- 成交率：[RATE]
- 获客成本：[CAC]
- 客户终身价值：[LTV]
为了达到 [TARGET_REVENUE]，我需要：
1. 将交易规模提高 X%
2. 将销售周期缩短 Y 天
3. 将成交率提高 Z%
4. 增加 N% 的客户
在接下来的 90 天里，这四个杠杆中哪一个是我能采取的具有最高影响力的举措？
```
**为什么有效**：收入增长是不均衡的。总有一个杠杆最重要。这能找到它。
## 6. 客户反馈模式分析
```
这是本月 [X] 位客户的反馈：
[PASTE FEEDBACK]
分析这个。对于你看到的每个模式：
1. 命名该模式
2. 有多少客户提到了它
3. 为什么它对我的业务很重要
4. 我应该采取的具体行动
然后对它们进行排名：最重要需采取行动的 vs. 锦上添花的
```
**为什么有效**：没有分析的反馈只是噪音。Claude 能发现你错过的主题。
## 7. 定价策略压力测试
```
我目前对 [OFFER] 收取 [PRICE]。
我的成本：[COSTS]
我对客户的价值：[VALUE]
市场平均水平：[MARKET_PRICE]
获客成本：[CAC]
我正在考虑提价到 [NEW_PRICE]。
告诉我：
1. 我会流失客户吗？风险是什么？
2. 即使成交量降低，我能赚更多钱吗？
3. 如果这适得其反，我的“核选项”是什么？
4. 我应该如何向客户解释这次涨价？
5. 一个能让怀疑者认可此价格的定位/角度？
```
**为什么有效**：定价是心理学+数学。这能把这两方面都做对。
## 8. 团队扩张分析
```
我目前的团队：
- [PERSON A]：[ROLE]，[CAPACITY]，[BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON B]：[ROLE]，[CAPACITY]，[BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON C]：[ROLE]，[CAPACITY]，[BOTTLENECK]
我目前的产出：[OUTPUT]
目标产出：[TARGET]
时间表：[WHEN]
达到目标的最快路径是什么？我应该：
1. 招聘新人？
2. 培训现有人员？
3. 调整角色结构？
4. 以不同方式授权？
5. 使用自动化？
给我一个 90 天的路线图。
```
**为什么有效**：当你没有诊断出真正的瓶颈时，团队扩张就会失败。这个提示词能诊断。
## 9. 产品市场契合度验证器
```
我的产品：[DESCRIPTION]
我的目标客户：[DESCRIPTION]
目前的吸引力：[CURRENT_METRICS]
表明有产品市场契合度的信号：
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
表明我们尚未达到契合度的信号：
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
基于此，我距离契合度有多近？接下来我应该测试的一件事是什么？
```
**为什么有效**：产品市场契合度是一种感觉，而不是事实。这验证了你应该信任哪种感觉。
## 10. 战略转型场景分析
```
我正在考虑从 [CURRENT] 转向 [PROPOSED]。
原因：[REASON]
风险：[RISK]
我需要的资源：[RESOURCES]
模拟这个场景：
1. 如果我转型并成功了，12 个月后我会在哪里？
2. 如果我转型但失败了，我会失去什么？
3. 如果我不转型但我的竞争对手转型了，他们会在哪里？
4. 可逆性如何？如果行不通，我能回得去吗？
5. 决定我是该转型还是留下的那一个指标是什么？
```
**为什么有效**：转型很可怕，因为下行风险感觉是无止境的。这会让它变得具体。
# 营销与内容（10 个提示词）
这些提示词帮助你创建真正能转化的内容，而不仅仅是获得浏览量。
## 11. 广告文案钩子生成器
```
产品：[PRODUCT_NAME]
它的作用：[WHAT]
给客户的好处：[BENEFIT]
目标人群：[WHO]
为广告文案生成 10 条不同的开场白（钩子）。每个钩子应该：
- 制造好奇心或不适感
- 具体（不模糊）
- 让某人停止滑动屏幕
- 最多 5-12 个单词
格式：“钩子文本” - [为什么有效]
```
**为什么有效**：80% 的转化发生在第一行。这些是现成可用的。
## 12. 邮件主题行 A/B 测试生成器
```
活动目标：[GOAL]
优惠：[OFFER]
目标受众：[AUDIENCE]
邮件正文预览：[PREVIEW]
生成 8 个邮件主题行。对于每一个，告诉我：
1. 背后的心理学原理（好奇心缺口、紧迫感、具体性等）
2. 相比基线预估的打开率提升
将它们分为两组：
A 组：保守型（打开概率高，风险较小）
B 组：激进型（侧重好奇心/紧迫感，方差较大）
我应该首先对哪两个进行 A/B 测试？
```
**为什么有效**：主题行决定邮件活动的成败。这会给你经过验证的模式。
## 13. 产品描述文案（侧重利益）
```
产品名称：[NAME]
功能列表：[FEATURES]
购买者：[CUSTOMER]
他们的主要问题：[PROBLEM]
价格：[PRICE]
写一个 150 字的产品描述：
- 以最大的好处开头（而不是功能）
- 包含一个具体的数字或例子
- 解决最常见的异议
- 以明确的下一步行动结束
格式：[描述] - [为什么这个版本能转化]
```
**为什么有效**：功能不卖货，利益卖。这会颠倒剧本。
## 14. LinkedIn 文章标题生成器
```
主题：[TOPIC]
主要要点：[TAKEAWAY]
你的独特角度：[ANGLE]
目标受众：[AUDIENCE]
生成 12 个 LinkedIn 文章标题。对于每一个，打分：
- 可分享性（0-10）
- 点击概率（0-10）
- 可信度（0-10）
给我平衡这三点的前 3 个标题。
```
**为什么有效**：LinkedIn 奖励具体、大胆的标题。这些公式很管用。
## 15. 销售页面章节大纲
```
产品：[PRODUCT]
理想客户：[CUSTOMER]
价格：[PRICE]
优惠：[OFFER]
创建一个包含以下章节的销售页面结构：
1. 标题 + 副标题
2. [你的章节]
3. 行动号召（CTA）+ 紧迫感元素
对于每个章节，写下：
- 章节名称
- 目的（它的作用）
- 3 个内容要点
- 起作用的心理学原理
```
**为什么有效**：销售页面失败是因为缺乏结构。这会给你蓝图。
## 16. 内容再利用框架
```
原始内容：[CONTENT_TYPE] - [TOPIC]
长度：[LENGTH]
原始受众：[AUDIENCE]
我想将其再利用为：
- [FORMAT_1]
- [FORMAT_2]
- [FORMAT_3]
对于每种格式，告诉我：
1. 从原始内容中保留什么
2. 删减或压缩什么
3. 增加或扩展什么
4. 最佳发布平台
5. 预计改编时间
```
**为什么有效**：每一篇内容都可以变成 5 篇。这会告诉你方法。
## 17. 竞争对手内容分析
```
竞争对手：[NAME]
他们最近的前 3 篇帖子：
- [POST_1]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_2]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_3]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
分析：
1. 什么对他们有效？为什么？
2. 在他们的热门帖子中你看到了什么模式？
3. 他们没有覆盖什么角度？
4. 我如何占据他们留下的空白？
给我 3 个让我与它们区分开来的内容创意。
```
**为什么有效**：最好的内容不是追随趋势，而是在空白处创造趋势。
## 18. 行动号召（CTA）优化器
```
当前的 CTA：[CURRENT_CTA]
当前的转化率：[RATE]
优惠：[OFFER]
异议：[MAIN_OBJECTION]
生成 8 个不同的 CTA，既能解决异议又能增加紧迫感。
按以下标准排名：
- 清晰度（0-10）
- 紧迫感（0-10）
- 可信度（0-10）
给我前 3 个可供测试的替代方案。
```
**为什么有效**：只改动一个词，CTA 就能让转化率提升 2-3 倍。这些很管用。
## 19. 发布计划内容日历
```
发布日期：[DATE]
产品：[PRODUCT]
发布阶段：[PHASES]
受众渠道：[CHANNELS]
为我建立一个 30 天的内容日历：
- 发布前（7 天前）
- 发布周
- 发布后（14 天后）
对于每一天：
- 发布什么
- 哪个渠道
- 目的（认知、可信度、紧迫感等）
- 关键信息
```
**为什么有效**：没有内容计划，发布就会失败。这提供了计划。
## 20. 客户成功故事框架
```
客户：[NAME]
他们之前的情况：[BEFORE]
他们使用了什么：[SOLUTION]
之后的结果：[AFTER]
时间跨度：[HOW_LONG]
创建一个 300 字的案例研究：
- 以他们最大的痛点开场
- 解释发生了什么变化
- 展示量化的结果
- 包含他们的一句话引用
- 以其他人如何复制这一结果结尾
格式适用于：网站 + LinkedIn + 邮件
```
**为什么有效**：故事的转化效果比声称好 10 倍。这能正确构建故事。
# 生产力与个人（10 个提示词）
这些是为了真正完成任务，而不仅仅是思考完成任务。
## 21. 每周复盘框架
```
本周我：
- 完成了：[WINS]
- 未完成：[INCOMPLETE]
- 学到了：[LEARNINGS]
- 时间花在：[TIME_BREAKDOWN]
下周，我需要：
[GOALS]
分析：
1. 实际时间去向与我计划的去向相比如何？
2. 有哪一件事能让下周的生产力提高 10 倍？
3. 我应该完全消除什么？
4. 你在我的表现中看到了什么模式？
给我下周 3 个具体的改变。
```
**为什么有效**：每周复盘是例行公事。这让它们真正有用。
## 22. 决策疲劳优先级过滤器
```
本周我有这些事情在争夺我的时间：
- [TASK_A]：[IMPACT]，[TIME]，[DEADLINE]
- [TASK_B]：[IMPACT]，[TIME]，[DEADLINE]
- [TASK_C]：[IMPACT]，[TIME]，[DEADLINE]
- [TASK_D]：[IMPACT]，[TIME]，[DEADLINE]
- [TASK_E]：[IMPACT]，[TIME]，[DEADLINE]
我的限制：
- 可用小时数：[HOURS]
- 精力高峰时间：[WHEN]
- 不可妥协的事项：[FIXED_COMMITMENTS]
按此排名：每小时的投入产出比（影响）。然后为我构建理想的一周，列出每个任务的开始/结束时间。
```
**为什么有效**：当任务太多时，你会瘫痪。这会让你摆脱瘫痪。
## 23. 习惯养成路线图
```
我想要的习惯：[HABIT]
我想要它的原因：[WHY]
目前的尝试：[ATTEMPTS_AND_FAILURES]
目前的障碍：[WHAT_STOPS_YOU]
为我设计一个习惯养成计划：
1. 将习惯分解为尽可能小的第一步
2. 将其叠加在我已经做的一个习惯上
3. 具体的触发器是什么？
4. 奖励是什么？
5. 我如何追踪它？
6. 我什么时候增加难度？
7. 如果我漏掉一天，我的 B 计划是什么？
```
**为什么有效**：大多数习惯失败是因为第一步太大了。这会让它变得微不足道。
## 24. 邮件分诊系统
```
我的邮件量：[DAILY_COUNT]
接收到的类别：[CATEGORIES]
目前的系统：[CURRENT_SYSTEM]
问题：[PROBLEM]
设计一个邮件系统：
1. 每天处理时间少于 30 分钟
2. 不会让重要的事情漏掉
3. 将紧急与重要区分开
4. 自动化低价值的邮件
给我：
- 过滤规则（if-then 语句）
- 文件夹结构
- 处理时间块
- 升级规则
```
**为什么有效**：在你正确分诊之前，邮件是生产力杀手。
## 25. 深度工作日程优化器
```
我理想的深度工作时长：[LENGTH] 小时
我的精力模式：[PEAK_TIMES]
我的会议：[FIXED_MEETINGS]
我的干扰：[MAIN_DISTRACTIONS]
为我建立一个每周日程：
- 保护 [X] 小时的不间断深度工作
- 将所有会议集中在 [NUMBER] 天
- 创建过渡缓冲期
- 包括休息
向我展示：
- 精确的时间块
- 如何向我的团队传达这些
- 在低精力时间该做什么
- 如果情况变化的备用日程
```
**为什么有效**：深度工作需要保护日程，而不是靠意志力。
## 26. 决策日志模板
```
决策：[WHAT_YOU'RE_DECIDING]
日期：[TODAY]
截止日期：[WHEN_YOU_NEED_ANSWER]
在决定之前，记录：
- 我认为会发生什么：[PREDICTION]
- 我为什么这么认为：[REASONING]
- 置信度水平：[0-100%]
- 决策：[WHAT_I'M_DOING]
创建一个我可以用来追踪的模板：
1. 我预测了什么
2. 实际发生了什么
3. 为什么存在差距
4. 我下次学到了什么
提供包含 3 个来自我过去决策的示例条目的示例模板。
```
**为什么有效**：决策日志能让你随着时间的推移更擅长预测。
## 27. 说“不”的回复模板
```
我收到的常见请求：
- [REQUEST_TYPE_1]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_2]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_3]
创建 3 种不同的“不”模板：
1. 温和的拒绝（保持关系）
2. 坚定的拒绝（界限清晰）
3. 重定向的拒绝（提供替代方案）
对于每一个：
- 使用场景
- 完整话术（可复制粘贴）
- 为什么有效
- 什么时候使用哪一个
```
**为什么有效**：一旦你有了一套话术，说“不”就变得容易了。
## 28. 会议议程模板
```
会议目的：[PURPOSE]
参会者：[WHO]
时长：[MINUTES]
目标：[WHAT_SUCCESS_LOOKS_LIKE]
创建一个议程模板：
- 以目标开场（1 分钟）
- 列出讨论……