# 35 KILLER Claude Prompts That Do The Work For You (steal these)
**作者**: Corey Ganim
**日期**: 2026-04-30T13:07:17.000Z
**来源**: [https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
---
This is your Claude prompt Bible. The prompts included here allow Claude to stop being a search engine replacement and start being a thinking tool that takes your business to a new level.
I've spent the last 6 months testing prompts across my workflows: business strategy, content creation, automation, and research.
Here are 35 of my most valuable, battle-tested prompts.
Copy/paste them into Claude and see what happens.
Bookmark this article. Come back to it when you need a productivity boost.
PS: Every week I send an email with tools, prompts, and automations designed to turn AI into ROI in your business.
Sign up for the (free) weekly email here.
# Strategy & Analysis (10 Prompts)
These prompts help you think through problems more clearly than you could alone. They're for the decisions that actually matter.
## 1. Business Model Validation
```
I'm considering launching [BUSINESS_IDEA]. Here's what I know:
- Target customer: [DESCRIPTION]
- Problem they have: [PROBLEM]
- Proposed solution: [SOLUTION]
- Current market alternatives: [ALTERNATIVES]
- My unfair advantage: [ADVANTAGE]
Analyze this business model. For each of these, give me:
1. Three specific risks I haven't thought of
2. One assumption I should validate FIRST before building anything
3. A revenue model that makes sense given my advantages
4. The most likely way this fails in year 1
5. One thing I should double-down on
Format as: [Risk] → [Why] → [How to mitigate]
```
Why this works: It forces you to articulate what you actually know vs. what you're guessing. Claude catches the gaps.
## 2. Competitive Differentiation Matrix
```
I'm competing in [MARKET]. My competitors are:
- [COMPETITOR A]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR B]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR C]: [KEY_STRENGTH], [KEY_WEAKNESS]
My business: [YOUR_DESCRIPTION]
Create a 5x5 matrix comparing: Price, Quality, Speed, Customer Support, Innovation
Then tell me:
1. Where am I winning?
2. Where am I vulnerable?
3. One position I could own that nobody else is competing for?
4. The one feature/service that would make me unbeatable?
```
Why this works: Competitive analysis done wrong is just noise. This forces comparison across the same dimensions.
## 3. Decision Matrix for High-Stakes Choices
```
I need to choose between [OPTION_A] and [OPTION_B].
Here's what I know about each:
OPTION A:
- Upside: [UPSIDE]
- Downside: [DOWNSIDE]
- Time commitment: [TIME]
- Financial cost: [COST]
- Reversibility: [CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
OPTION B:
- Upside: [UPSIDE]
- Downside: [DOWNSIDE]
- Time commitment: [TIME]
- Financial cost: [COST]
- Reversibility: [CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
My priorities: [PRIORITY_1], [PRIORITY_2], [PRIORITY_3]
Build a decision framework that ranks these options using my priorities. What's my move?
```
Why this works: When you have competing priorities, ranking by gut feeling fails. This structures it.
## 4. Go/No-Go Project Evaluation
```
Project name: [PROJECT_NAME]
Goal: [GOAL]
Resources required: [TIME/MONEY/PEOPLE]
Timeline: [START_DATE] to [END_DATE]
Success metric: [HOW_YOU'LL_KNOW_IT_WORKED]
Current context:
- My bandwidth: [YOUR_CAPACITY]
- Strategic fit: [HOW_IT_ALIGNS]
- Opportunity cost: [WHAT_YOU_GIVE_UP]
As a decision advisor, should I start this project NOW, DELAY it, or KILL it? Give me:
1. Your recommendation with confidence level (0-100%)
2. Three hidden costs nobody mentions
3. One question I should ask before deciding
```
Why this works: Most projects fail because they were never worth starting. This helps you say no.
## 5. Revenue Bottleneck Analysis
```
I'm making [CURRENT_REVENUE] with [NUMBER_OF_CLIENTS].
My unit economics:
- Average deal size: [ADS]
- Sales cycle length: [CYCLE]
- Close rate: [RATE]
- Customer acquisition cost: [CAC]
- Customer lifetime value: [LTV]
To reach [TARGET_REVENUE], I need to:
1. Increase deal size by X%
2. Decrease sales cycle by Y days
3. Improve close rate by Z%
4. Add more clients by N%
Which of these four levers is the highest-impact move I can make in the next 90 days?
```
Why this works: Revenue doesn't grow evenly. There's always one lever that matters most. This finds it.
## 6. Customer Feedback Pattern Analysis
```
Here's feedback from [X] customers this month:
[PASTE FEEDBACK]
Analyze this. For each pattern you see:
1. Name the pattern
2. How many customers mentioned it
3. Why it matters for my business
4. Specific action I should take
Then rank them: Most important to act on vs. Nice to have
```
Why this works: Feedback without analysis is just noise. Claude spots the themes you miss.
## 7. Pricing Strategy Stress Test
```
I'm currently charging [PRICE] for [OFFER].
My costs: [COSTS]
My value to the customer: [VALUE]
Market average: [MARKET_PRICE]
Customer acquisition cost: [CAC]
I'm considering raising to [NEW_PRICE].
Tell me:
1. Will I lose customers? What's the risk?
2. Will I make more money even with lower volume?
3. What's my "nuclear option" if this backfires?
4. What should I say to customers about the increase?
5. One position/angle that justifies this price to skeptics?
```
Why this works: Pricing is psychology + math. This gets both right.
## 8. Team Scaling Analysis
```
My current team:
- [PERSON A]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON B]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON C]: [ROLE], [CAPACITY], [BOTTLENECK]
My current output: [OUTPUT]
Target output: [TARGET]
Timeline: [WHEN]
What's the fastest path to hit my target? Should I:
1. Hire someone new?
2. Train existing people?
3. Restructure roles?
4. Delegate differently?
5. Use automation?
Give me a 90-day roadmap.
```
Why this works: Team scaling fails when you don't diagnose the real bottleneck. This does.
## 9. Product-Market Fit Validator
```
My product: [DESCRIPTION]
My target customer: [DESCRIPTION]
Current traction: [CURRENT_METRICS]
Signals that suggest product-market fit:
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
Signals that suggest we DON'T have it yet:
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
Based on this, how close am I? What's the ONE thing I should test next?
```
Why this works: Product-market fit is a feeling, not a fact. This validates which feeling you should trust.
## 10. Strategic Pivot Scenario Analysis
```
I'm considering pivoting from [CURRENT] to [PROPOSED].
Why: [REASON]
Risk: [RISK]
Resources I'd need: [RESOURCES]
Model this scenario:
1. If I pivot and it works, where am I in 12 months?
2. If I pivot and it fails, what have I lost?
3. If I don't pivot but my competitor does, where are they?
4. What's the reversibility? Can I go back if it doesn't work?
5. The ONE metric that tells me to pivot vs. stay?
```
Why this works: Pivots are scary because the downside feels infinite. This makes it concrete.
# Marketing & Content (10 Prompts)
These prompts help you create content that actually converts instead of just getting views.
## 11. Hook Generator for Ad Copy
```
Product: [PRODUCT_NAME]
What it does: [WHAT]
Benefit to customer: [BENEFIT]
Target person: [WHO]
Generate 10 different opening lines (hooks) for ad copy. Each hook should:
- Create curiosity or discomfort
- Be specific (not vague)
- Make someone stop scrolling
- Be 5-12 words max
Format: "Hook text" - [Why it works]
```
Why this works: 80% of conversions happen in the first line. These are production-ready.
## 12. Email Subject Line A/B Test Generator
```
Campaign goal: [GOAL]
Offer: [OFFER]
Target audience: [AUDIENCE]
Email body preview: [PREVIEW]
Generate 8 email subject lines. For each, tell me:
1. The psychology behind it (curiosity gap, urgency, specificity, etc.)
2. Estimated open rate increase vs. baseline
Split them into two groups:
GROUP A: Conservative (high probability of open, less risky)
GROUP B: Aggressive (curiosity/urgency focused, higher variance)
Which 2 should I A/B test first?
```
Why this works: Subject lines make or break email campaigns. This gives you tested patterns.
## 13. Product Description Copy (Benefits Focus)
```
Product name: [NAME]
Feature list: [FEATURES]
Who buys this: [CUSTOMER]
Their main problem: [PROBLEM]
Price: [PRICE]
Write a 150-word product description that:
- Leads with the biggest benefit (not the feature)
- Includes ONE specific number or example
- Addresses the most common objection
- Ends with a clear next step
Format: [Description] - [Why this version converts]
```
Why this works: Features don't sell. Benefits do. This flips the script.
## 14. LinkedIn Article Title Generator
```
Topic: [TOPIC]
Main takeaway: [TAKEAWAY]
Your unique angle: [ANGLE]
Target audience: [AUDIENCE]
Generate 12 LinkedIn article titles. For each, score it on:
- Shareability (0-10)
- Click probability (0-10)
- Credibility (0-10)
Give me the top 3 that balance all three.
```
Why this works: LinkedIn rewards specific, bold titles. These formulas work.
## 15. Sales Page Section Outline
```
Product: [PRODUCT]
Ideal customer: [CUSTOMER]
Price: [PRICE]
Offer: [OFFER]
Create a sales page structure with these sections:
1. Headline + subheadline
2. [YOUR SECTIONS]
3. CTA + urgency element
For each section, write:
- The section name
- The purpose (what it does)
- 3 bullet points of content
- The psychological principle at work
```
Why this works: Sales pages fail because they're not structured. This gives you the blueprint.
## 16. Content Repurposing Framework
```
Original content: [CONTENT_TYPE] - [TOPIC]
Length: [LENGTH]
Original audience: [AUDIENCE]
I want to repurpose this into:
- [FORMAT_1]
- [FORMAT_2]
- [FORMAT_3]
For each format, tell me:
1. What to keep from the original
2. What to cut or condense
3. What to add or expand
4. Best platform to publish it
5. Estimated time to adapt
```
Why this works: Every piece of content can become 5 pieces. This shows you how.
## 17. Competitor Content Analysis
```
Competitor: [NAME]
Their top 3 recent posts:
- [POST_1]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_2]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_3]: [ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
Analyze:
1. What's working for them? Why?
2. What pattern do you see across their top posts?
3. What angle are they NOT covering?
4. How could I own the gap they're leaving?
Give me 3 content ideas that differentiate me from them.
```
Why this works: The best content doesn't follow trends, it creates them in gaps.
## 18. Call-to-Action Optimizer
```
Current CTA: [CURRENT_CTA]
Current conversion rate: [RATE]
Offer: [OFFER]
Objection: [MAIN_OBJECTION]
Generate 8 different CTAs that address the objection while increasing urgency.
Rank them by:
- Clarity (0-10)
- Urgency (0-10)
- Credibility (0-10)
Give me the top 3 alternatives to test.
```
Why this works: CTA can 2-3x conversions with one word change. These work.
## 19. Launch Plan Content Calendar
```
Launch date: [DATE]
Product: [PRODUCT]
Launch phases: [PHASES]
Audience channels: [CHANNELS]
Build me a 30-day content calendar:
- Pre-launch (7 days before)
- Launch week
- Post-launch (14 days after)
For each day:
- What to publish
- Which channel
- Purpose (awareness, credibility, urgency, etc.)
- Key message
```
Why this works: Launches fail without a content plan. This provides it.
## 20. Customer Success Story Framework
```
Customer: [NAME]
Their situation before: [BEFORE]
What they used: [SOLUTION]
Result after: [AFTER]
Timeline: [HOW_LONG]
Create a 300-word case study that:
- Opens with their biggest pain
- Explains what changed
- Shows the quantified result
- Includes 1 quote from them
- Ends with how others can replicate it
Format for: Website + LinkedIn + Email
```
Why this works: Stories convert 10x better than claims. This structures them right.
# Productivity & Personal (10 Prompts)
These are for getting things done, not just thinking about getting things done.
## 21. Weekly Review Framework
```
This week I:
- Accomplished: [WINS]
- Failed to complete: [INCOMPLETE]
- Learned: [LEARNINGS]
- Spent time on: [TIME_BREAKDOWN]
For next week, I need to:
[GOALS]
Analyze:
1. Where did time actually go vs. where I planned it?
2. What's the ONE thing that would make next week 10x more productive?
3. What should I eliminate entirely?
4. What patterns do you see in my performance?
Give me 3 specific changes for next week.
```
Why this works: Weekly reviews are routine. This makes them actually useful.
## 22. Priority Filter for Decision Fatigue
```
I have these things competing for my time this week:
- [TASK_A]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_B]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_C]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_D]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
- [TASK_E]: [IMPACT], [TIME], [DEADLINE]
My constraints:
- Available hours: [HOURS]
- Peak energy time: [WHEN]
- Non-negotiables: [FIXED_COMMITMENTS]
Rank these by: Impact per hour spent. Then build my ideal week with start/end times for each task.
```
Why this works: When you have too many tasks, you paralyzed. This unparalyzed you.
## 23. Habit Formation Roadmap
```
Habit I want: [HABIT]
Why I want it: [WHY]
Current attempts: [ATTEMPTS_AND_FAILURES]
Current blocker: [WHAT_STOPS_YOU]
Design me a habit formation plan:
1. Break the habit into the smallest possible first step
2. Stack it onto a habit I already do
3. What's the specific trigger?
4. What's the reward?
5. How do I track it?
6. When do I increase difficulty?
7. What's my backup plan when I miss a day?
```
Why this works: Most habits fail because the first step is too big. This makes it tiny.
## 24. Email Triage System
```
My email volume: [DAILY_COUNT]
Categories that come in: [CATEGORIES]
Current system: [CURRENT_SYSTEM]
Problem: [PROBLEM]
Design an email system that:
1. Takes less than 30 minutes daily to process
2. Doesn't let important things fall through
3. Separates urgent from important
4. Automates low-value email
Give me:
- Filter rules (if-then statements)
- Folder structure
- Processing time blocks
- Escalation rules
```
Why this works: Email is a productivity killer until you triage it right.
## 25. Deep Work Schedule Optimizer
```
My ideal deep work session: [LENGTH] hours
My energy pattern: [PEAK_TIMES]
My meetings: [FIXED_MEETINGS]
My distractions: [MAIN_DISTRACTIONS]
Build me a weekly schedule that:
- Protects [X] hours of uninterrupted deep work
- Batches all meetings into [NUMBER] days
- Creates transition buffers
- Includes breaks
Show me:
- Exact time blocks
- How to communicate these to my team
- What to do during low-energy time
- Backup schedule if things change
```
Why this works: Deep work requires schedule protection, not willpower.
## 26. Decision Journal Template
```
Decision: [WHAT_YOU'RE_DECIDING]
Date: [TODAY]
Deadline: [WHEN_YOU_NEED_ANSWER]
Before deciding, record:
- What I think will happen: [PREDICTION]
- Why I think that: [REASONING]
- Confidence level: [0-100%]
- Decision: [WHAT_I'M_DOING]
Create a template I can use to track:
1. What I predicted
2. What actually happened
3. Why the gap exists
4. What I learned for next time
Example template with 3 sample entries from my past decisions.
```
Why this works: Decision journals make you better at predicting over time.
## 27. Saying "No" Response Templates
```
Common requests I get:
- [REQUEST_TYPE_1]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_2]
- [REQUEST_TYPE_3]
Create 3 different "no" templates:
1. The warm no (keeps relationship)
2. The firm no (clear boundary)
3. The redirect no (offer alternative)
For each:
- Use case
- Full script (copy-paste ready)
- Why it works
- When to use which one
```
Why this works: Saying no is hard until you have a script.
## 28. Meeting Agenda Template
```
Meeting purpose: [PURPOSE]
Attendees: [WHO]
Duration: [MINUTES]
Goal: [WHAT_SUCCESS_LOOKS_LIKE]
Create an agenda template that:
- Opens with the goal (1 minute)
- Lists discussion topics with time allocations
- Includes decision points
- Closes with clear next steps and owners
Then give me:
- Instructions for the agenda-setter
- Instructions for attendees
- How to stay on time
- How to document decisions
```
Why this works: Agendas prevent meetings from becoming noise.
## 29. Energy Management Schedule
```
My energy pattern across a week:
- Morning: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Midday: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Afternoon: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
- Evening: [ENERGY_LEVEL]
High-energy activities I can do: [ACTIVITIES]
Low-energy activities I must do: [ACTIVITIES]
Design a week where:
1. High-impact work happens during peak energy
2. Admin/low-value work happens during low energy
3. I take breaks BEFORE energy crashes
4. I finish each day with momentum for the next day
Show me the week structure with activities assigned.
```
Why this works: Most productivity systems ignore energy. This doesn't.
## 30. Personal Quarterly Review
```
Last quarter I:
- Goals set: [GOALS]
- Goals completed: [COMPLETED]
- Surprises: [UNEXPECTED]
- Regrets: [WHAT_I'D_CHANGE]
- Growth: [HOW_I_GREW]
For next quarter:
- Keep doing: [KEEP]
- Stop doing: [STOP]
- Start doing: [START]
Give me:
1. 3 goals that are ambitious but achievable
2. The ONE habit that would make everything else easier
3. My personal development focus
4. How I'll measure success
```
Why this works: Most people don't review progress. Reviewing changes everything.
# Research & Data (5 Prompts)
When you need information quickly and structured.
## 31. Competitor Intelligence Summary
```
Company: [COMPANY_NAME]
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Why I care: [WHY]
Give me:
1. Business model (how they make money)
2. Main product/service
3. Recent funding/news
4. Their competitive advantages
5. Known weaknesses
6. Their likely next move
Format: [Bullet points for quick scanning]
```
Why this works: Competitor research without analysis is just facts. This gives you insight.
## 32. Industry Trend Analysis
```
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Timeframe: [YEARS]
My interest: [WHY]
Summarize the major shifts in:
1. Customer behavior
2. Technology adoption
3. Regulatory changes
4. Competitive landscape
5. Pricing models
For each trend:
- What's changing
- Why it matters
- Opportunities I should notice
- Timeline for when it matters
```
Why this works: Trends matter less than understanding which ones affect you.
## 33. Market Size Estimation
```
Market: [MARKET]
Customer: [WHO_BUYS]
Price point: [TYPICAL_PRICE]
Geographic focus: [WHERE]
Help me estimate:
1. Total addressable market (TAM)
2. Serviceable addressable market (SAM)
3. Serviceable obtainable market (SOM)
For each:
- Your methodology
- Key assumptions
- Range of estimates
- Confidence level
- What would change the estimate
```
Why this works: Market sizing is part art, part science. This guides both.
## 34. Benchmark Research Compilation
```
Benchmark category: [CATEGORY]
Metric: [METRIC]
Industry: [INDUSTRY]
Company size: [SIZE]
Find me:
1. Industry average
2. Top quartile (where the winners are)
3. Bottom quartile (what underperforming looks like)
4. Median
5. Trend over time (if available)
For each number:
- Source (if you know it)
- Sample size (if known)
- How it's calculated
- Why it matters for my business
```
Why this works: Benchmarks give you context. Without context, metrics are meaningless.
## 35. Expert Research Synthesis
```
Topic: [TOPIC]
Question: [WHAT_YOU_WANT_TO_KNOW]
Perspective: [WHOSE_VIEW_MATTERS]
Synthesize research on this topic by:
1. Main schools of thought (if they disagree)
2. The most credible voices on this
3. What the data actually shows
4. Common misconceptions
5. What's still uncertain/debated
6. Practical application for my situation
Format: [Executive summary at top, then detailed breakdown]
```
Why this works: Research without synthesis is just noise. This makes it useful.
# How to Actually Use These
These prompts work because they're specific. But here's the thing: Claude is better than these prompts. If you use them as templates and adapt them to your exact situation, they become 10x more powerful.
Step 1: Copy a prompt that matches your situation.
Step 2: Fill in the [BRACKETS] with your actual information.
Step 3: Paste into Claude and hit send.
Step 4: Use the output as a starting point, not a finished answer.
The prompt isn't the intelligence. You are. The prompt just structures your thinking so Claude can help you think clearer.
# Key Takeaways
- Strategy prompts force you to articulate what you actually know vs. guessing
- Content prompts turn gut feeling into frameworks that work
- Productivity prompts protect your time instead of just managing it
- Research prompts turn information into insight
- All of these are templates. Adapt them to your situation for better results
- Claude is a thinking tool, not an answer machine. Use these to think clearer, faster
Start with one prompt in each category. Use it weekly. Watch your decision-making get faster and better.
PS: Every week I send an email with tools, prompts, and automations designed to turn AI into ROI in your business.
Sign up for the (free) weekly email here.
## 相关链接
- [Corey Ganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [@coreyganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [8.2K](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [Upgrade to Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [9:07 PM · Apr 30, 2026](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
- [8,224 Views](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [View quotes](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/quotes)
---
*导出时间: 2026/5/1 12:32:30*
---
## 中文翻译
# 35 个杀手级 Claude 提示词，让它们替你干活（快来抄走）
**作者**： Corey Ganim
**日期**： 2026-04-30T13:07:17.000Z
**来源**： [https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
---
这是你的 Claude 提示词圣经。这里收录的提示词能让 Claude 不再只是一个搜索引擎替代品，而是成为一个能将你的业务提升到新高度的思维工具。
过去 6 个月，我在自己的各个工作流程中测试了各种提示词：商业战略、内容创作、自动化和研究。
以下是我最有价值、经过实战检验的 35 个提示词。
把它们复制/粘贴到 Claude 里，看看会发生什么。
收藏这篇文章。当你需要提升效率时再回来看看。
另外：我每周都会发送一封邮件，分享旨在把 AI 转化为业务回报的工具、提示词和自动化方案。
点击这里注册（免费）每周邮件。
# 战略与分析（10 个提示词）
这些提示词能帮你比独自思考更清晰地理清问题。它们适用于那些真正重要的决策。
## 1. 商业模式验证
```
我正在考虑推出 [BUSINESS_IDEA]。以下是我已知的信息：
- 目标客户：[DESCRIPTION]
- 他们面临的问题：[PROBLEM]
- 拟议的解决方案：[SOLUTION]
- 目前市场上的替代方案：[ALTERNATIVES]
- 我的独特优势：[ADVANTAGE]
分析这个商业模式。针对每一项，请给我：
1. 三个我没想到的具体风险
2. 在构建任何东西之前我应该首先验证的一个假设
3. 考虑到我的优势，一个合理的收入模式
4. 这个项目在第一年最可能的失败方式
5. 一件我应该加倍投入的事
格式：[风险] → [原因] → [如何缓解]
```
为什么有效：它迫使你分清自己真正知道的东西和纯粹猜测的东西。Claude 能发现其中的漏洞。
## 2. 竞争差异化矩阵
```
我在 [MARKET] 市场参与竞争。我的竞争对手是：
- [COMPETITOR A]：[KEY_STRENGTH]、[KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR B]：[KEY_STRENGTH]、[KEY_WEAKNESS]
- [COMPETITOR C]：[KEY_STRENGTH]、[KEY_WEAKNESS]
我的业务：[YOUR_DESCRIPTION]
创建一个 5x5 矩阵，比较：价格、质量、速度、客户支持、创新
然后告诉我：
1. 我在哪些方面占优势？
2. 我在哪些方面比较脆弱？
3. 我可以占据的一个没有其他人竞争的定位是什么？
4. 哪一个功能/服务能让我变得无可匹敌？
```
为什么有效：做得不好的竞争分析只是噪音。这个提示词强制在同一维度上进行比较。
## 3. 高风险决策矩阵
```
我需要在 [OPTION_A] 和 [OPTION_B] 之间做出选择。
以下是我对每个选项的了解：
选项 A：
- 上行空间：[UPSIDE]
- 下行风险：[DOWNSIDE]
- 时间投入：[TIME]
- 财务成本：[COST]
- 可逆性：[CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
选项 B：
- 上行空间：[UPSIDE]
- 下行风险：[DOWNSIDE]
- 时间投入：[TIME]
- 财务成本：[COST]
- 可逆性：[CAN_I_UNDO_IT]
我的优先事项：[PRIORITY_1]、[PRIORITY_2]、[PRIORITY_3]
构建一个根据我的优先事项对这些选项进行排序的决策框架。我该怎么做？
```
为什么有效：当存在相互冲突的优先事项时，凭直觉排序往往会失败。这个提示词让决策结构化。
## 4. 项目是否启动评估
```
项目名称：[PROJECT_NAME]
目标：[GOAL]
所需资源：[TIME/MONEY/PEOPLE]
时间表：[START_DATE] 至 [END_DATE]
成功指标：[HOW_YOU'LL_KNOW_IT_WORKED]
当前背景：
- 我的精力：[YOUR_CAPACITY]
- 战略契合度：[HOW_IT_ALIGNS]
- 机会成本：[WHAT_YOU_GIVE_UP]
作为决策顾问，我应该立即启动（NOW）、推迟（DELAY）还是取消（KILL）这个项目？请给我：
1. 你的建议及置信度（0-100%）
2. 三个没人提及的隐性成本
3. 一个我在做决定前应该问的问题
```
为什么有效：大多数项目失败是因为它们从一开始就不值得做。这个提示词帮你学会说不。
## 5. 收入瓶颈分析
```
我目前的收入是 [CURRENT_REVENUE]，客户数量为 [NUMBER_OF_CLIENTS]。
我的单位经济效益：
- 平均交易额：[ADS]
- 销售周期长度：[CYCLE]
- 成交率：[RATE]
- 客户获取成本：[CAC]
- 客户终身价值：[LTV]
要达到 [TARGET_REVENUE]，我需要：
1. 将交易额提高 X%
2. 将销售周期缩短 Y 天
3. 将成交率提高 Z%
4. 将客户数量增加 N%
在这四个杠杆中，哪一个是我未来 90 天内能采取的最高影响力的行动？
```
为什么有效：收入增长是不均匀的。总有一个杠杆最重要。这个提示词帮你找到它。
## 6. 客户反馈模式分析
```
以下是我这个月从 [X] 位客户那里收到的反馈：
[PASTE FEEDBACK]
分析这些内容。对于你发现的每一种模式：
1. 给该模式命名
2. 有多少客户提到了它
3. 它对我的业务为什么重要
4. 我应该采取的具体行动
然后对它们排序：最需要处理的 vs. 锦上添花的
```
为什么有效：没有分析的反馈只是噪音。Claude 能发现你遗漏的主题。
## 7. 定价策略压力测试
```
我目前对 [OFFER] 的定价是 [PRICE]。
我的成本：[COSTS]
我为客户提供的价值：[VALUE]
市场平均价：[MARKET_PRICE]
客户获取成本：[CAC]
我正在考虑将价格提高到 [NEW_PRICE]。
告诉我：
1. 我会流失客户吗？风险有多大？
2. 即使销量下降，我能赚更多钱吗？
3. 如果事与愿违，我的“核选项”是什么？
4. 关于涨价，我该怎么对客户说？
5. 有什么定位/角度能向质疑者证明这个价格的合理性？
```
为什么有效：定价是心理学加数学。这个提示词两者都兼顾了。
## 8. 团队扩张分析
```
我目前的团队：
- [PERSON A]：[ROLE]、[CAPACITY]、[BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON B]：[ROLE]、[CAPACITY]、[BOTTLENECK]
- [PERSON C]：[ROLE]、[CAPACITY]、[BOTTLENECK]
我目前的产出：[OUTPUT]
目标产出：[TARGET]
时间表：[WHEN]
达成目标的最快路径是什么？我应该：
1. 招聘新人？
2. 培训现有人员？
3. 重组角色？
4. 改变授权方式？
5. 使用自动化？
给我一份 90 天路线图。
```
为什么有效：如果不诊断出真正的瓶颈，团队扩张就会失败。这个提示词能帮你做到。
## 9. 产品市场契合度验证器
```
我的产品：[DESCRIPTION]
我的目标客户：[DESCRIPTION]
当前增长势头：[CURRENT_METRICS]
表明产品市场契合的信号：
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
表明我们尚未达到契合的信号：
- [SIGNAL_1]
- [SIGNAL_2]
- [SIGNAL_3]
基于这些，我离契合还有多远？我下一步最应该验证的一件事是什么？
```
为什么有效：产品市场契合是一种感觉，而非事实。这个提示能帮你验证哪种感觉值得信任。
## 10. 战略转型情景分析
```
我正在考虑从 [CURRENT] 转型到 [PROPOSED]。
原因：[REASON]
风险：[RISK]
我需要的资源：[RESOURCES]
为这个情景建模：
1. 如果我转型且成功了，12个月后我会在哪里？
2. 如果我转型但失败了，我会失去什么？
3. 如果我不转型但竞争对手转型了，他们会处于什么位置？
4. 可逆性如何？如果不行我能退回去吗？
5. 告诉我该转型还是坚守的那一个关键指标是什么？
```
为什么有效：转型之所以可怕，是因为下行风险感觉是无穷的。这个提示让它变得具体。
# 营销与内容（10 个提示词）
这些提示词帮你创建真正能带来转化的内容，而不仅仅是获得浏览量。
## 11. 广告文案钩子生成器
```
产品：[PRODUCT_NAME]
它的功能：[WHAT]
给客户带来的好处：[BENEFIT]
目标人群：[WHO]
生成 10 个不同的广告文案开头句（钩子）。每个钩子应该：
- 激发好奇心或制造不适感
- 具体明确（不要模糊）
- 能让人停止滑动屏幕
- 最多 5-12 个词
格式："钩子文案" - [为什么有效]
```
为什么有效：80% 的转化发生在第一行。这些都是可以直接投入使用的。
## 12. 邮件标题 A/B 测试生成器
```
营销活动目标：[GOAL]
优惠内容：[OFFER]
目标受众：[AUDIENCE]
邮件正文预览：[PREVIEW]
生成 8 个邮件标题。针对每个标题，告诉我：
1. 背后的心理学原理（好奇心缺口、紧迫感、具体性等）
2. 相比基准的预计打开率提升
把它们分成两组：
A 组：保守型（高打开概率，风险较低）
B 组：激进型（注重好奇心/紧迫感，波动更大）
我应该先对哪两个进行 A/B 测试？
```
为什么有效：邮件标题决定营销活动的成败。这个提示给你经过验证的套路。
## 13. 产品描述文案（以好处为核心）
```
产品名称：[NAME]
功能列表：[FEATURES]
购买人群：[CUSTOMER]
他们的主要问题：[PROBLEM]
价格：[PRICE]
写一段 150 字的产品描述，要求：
- 以最大的好处开头（而不是功能）
- 包含一个具体的数字或例子
- 回应最常见的疑虑
- 以明确的下一步行动结尾
格式：[描述] - [为什么这个版本能带来转化]
```
为什么有效：功能卖不动产品，好处才可以。这个提示让你转换视角。
## 14. LinkedIn 文章标题生成器
```
主题：[TOPIC]
核心要点：[TAKEAWAY]
你的独特视角：[ANGLE]
目标受众：[AUDIENCE]
生成 12 个 LinkedIn 文章标题。针对每个标题，按以下维度评分：
- 可分享性（0-10）
- 点击概率（0-10）
- 可信度（0-10）
给出在三个方面平衡最好的前 3 个。
```
为什么有效：LinkedIn 奖励具体、大胆的标题。这些公式行之有效。
## 15. 销售页面板块大纲
```
产品：[PRODUCT]
理想客户：[CUSTOMER]
价格：[PRICE]
优惠内容：[OFFER]
创建一个包含以下板块的销售页面结构：
1. 主标题 + 副标题
2. [你的板块]
3. 行动号召（CTA）+ 紧迫感元素
针对每个板块，写出：
- 板块名称
- 目的（它的作用）
- 3 个内容要点
- 所运用的心理学原理
```
为什么有效：销售页面失败是因为缺乏结构。这个提示给你蓝图。
## 16. 内容再利用框架
```
原始内容：[CONTENT_TYPE] - [TOPIC]
长度：[LENGTH]
原始受众：[AUDIENCE]
我想把这份内容再利用为：
- [FORMAT_1]
- [FORMAT_2]
- [FORMAT_3]
针对每种格式，告诉我：
1. 保留原内容的哪些部分
2. 删除或精简哪些部分
3. 添加或扩展哪些内容
4. 最适合发布该内容的平台
5. 改编所需的预计时间
```
为什么有效：每一份内容都可以变成 5 份。这个提示告诉你怎么做。
## 17. 竞争对手内容分析
```
竞争对手：[NAME]
他们最近的 3 篇热门帖子：
- [POST_1]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_2]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
- [POST_3]：[ENGAGEMENT_METRICS]
分析：
1. 什么对他们有效？为什么？
2. 在他们的热门帖子中你发现了什么共同模式？
3. 他们没有覆盖到什么角度？
4. 我如何占据他们留下的空白？
给我 3 个能让我与他们差异化的内容创意。
```
为什么有效：最好的内容不是追随潮流，而是在空白处创造潮流。
## 18. 行动号召（CTA）优化器
```
当前 CTA：[CURRENT_CTA]
当前转化率：[RATE]
优惠内容：[OFFER]
主要疑虑：[MAIN_OBJECTION]
生成 8 个不同的 CTA，在增强紧迫感的同时化解该疑虑。
按以下维度排名：
- 清晰度（0-10）
- 紧迫感（0-10）
- 可信度（0-10）
给我最值得测试的前 3 个替代方案。
```
为什么有效：CTA 只需改动一个词就能让转化率提升 2-3 倍。这些都很管用。
## 19. 发布计划内容日历
```
发布日期：[DATE]
产品：[PRODUCT]
发布阶段：[PHASES]
受众渠道：[CHANNELS]
为我制定一个 30 天内容日历：
- 发布前（提前 7 天）
- 发布周
- 发布后（之后 14 天）
针对每一天：
- 发布什么内容
- 使用哪个渠道
- 目的（认知度、可信度、紧迫感等）
- 核心信息
```
为什么有效：没有内容计划的发布注定失败。这个提示为你提供计划。
## 20. 客户成功案例框架
```
客户：[NAME]
之前的情况：[BEFORE]
他们使用的产品：[SOLUTION]
之后的结果：[AFTER]
时间线：[HOW_LONG]
写一篇 300 字的案例研究，要求：
- 以他们最大的痛点开头
- 解释发生了什么改变
- 展示量化的结果
- 包含他们的一句引言
- 以其他人如何复制这一成果结尾
适配格式：网站 + LinkedIn + 邮件
```
为什么有效：故事的转化效果比单纯的宣称高 10 倍。这个提示帮你正确构建故事。
# 效率与个人（10 个提示词）
这些提示词是用来真正把事情做完的，而不仅仅是想想而已。
## 21. 每周复盘框架
```
本周我：
- 完成了：[成果]
- 未能完成：[未完成事项]
- 学到了：[心得]
- 时间花在了：[时间分配]
下周我需要：
[目标]
分析：
1. 时间实际花在了哪里，与我计划的有何不同？
2. 哪一件事能让下周的效率提高 10 倍？
3. 我应该彻底剔除什么？
4. 你在我的表现中看到了什么规律？
给我 3 个下周的具体改变。
```
为什么有效：每周复盘往往流于形式。这个提示词让复盘真正有用。
## 22. 应对决策疲劳的优先级过滤器
```
本周这些事情在争夺我的时间：
- [任务A]：[影响]，[耗时]，[截止日期]
- [任务B]：[影响]，[耗时]，[截止日期]
- [任务C]：[影响]，[耗时]，[截止日期]
- [任务D]：[影响]，[耗时]，[截止日期]
- [任务E]：[影响]，[耗时]，[截止日期]
我的限制条件：
- 可用时间：[小时数]
- 精力高峰时段：[何时]
- 不可妥协事项：[固定安排]
按以下标准排序：每小时投入产生的影响。然后帮我规划理想的一周，为每项任务安排开始/结束时间。
```
为什么有效：任务太多时，人会陷入瘫痪。这个提示词帮你摆脱瘫痪。
## 23. 习惯养成路线图
```
我想养成的习惯：[习惯]
为什么想要：[原因]
以往的尝试：[尝试与失败经历]
目前的障碍：[什么阻止了你]
为我设计一个习惯养成计划：
1. 把习惯拆解成尽可能小的第一步
2. 把它叠加到我已有的习惯上
3. 具体的触发条件是什么？
4. 奖励是什么？
5. 我如何追踪它？
6. 什么时候提高难度？
7. 如果漏掉一天，我的备用计划是什么？
```
为什么有效：大多数习惯失败是因为第一步太大。这个提示词把它变得微小。
## 24. 邮件分类系统
```
我的邮件量：[每日数量]
收到的邮件类别：[类别]
现有系统：[现有系统]
问题：[问题]
设计一个邮件系统，要求：
1. 每天处理时间不超过 30 分钟
2. 不遗漏重要事项
3. 区分紧急与重要
4. 自动化处理低价值邮件
给我：
- 筛选规则（如果-那么语句）
- 文件夹结构
- 处理时间段
- 升级处理规则
```
为什么有效：邮件是效率杀手，除非你正确地对它进行分类。
## 25. 深度工作时间表优化器
```
我理想的深度工作时段：[时长] 小时
我的精力规律：[高峰时段]
我的会议：[固定会议]
我的干扰因素：[主要干扰]
为我制定一份周时间表，要求：
- 保护 [X] 小时不被打断的深度工作时间
- 将所有会议集中到 [数量] 天
- 设置过渡缓冲时间
- 包含休息时间
向我展示：
- 精确的时间块
- 如何向团队传达这些安排
- 低能量时段该做什么
- 情况变化时的备用时间表
```
为什么有效：深度工作需要时间表上的保护，而不是意志力。
## 26. 决策日志模板
```
决策：[你要决定什么]
日期：[今天]
截止日期：[何时需要答案]
在决策前，记录：
- 我认为会发生什么：[预测]
- 我为什么这么认为：[推理过程]
- 置信水平：[0-100%]
- 决策：[我要做什么]
创建一个模板，供我追踪：
1. 我预测了什么
2. 实际发生了什么
3. 差距为什么存在
4. 我为下次学到了什么
给出一个模板，并附上来自我过去决策的 3 个示例条目。
```
为什么有效：决策日志能让你随着时间推移越来越善于预测。
## 27. 说“不”的回复模板
```
我常收到的请求：
- [请求类型1]
- [请求类型2]
- [请求类型3]
创建 3 种不同的“拒绝”模板：
1. 温和的拒绝（维系关系）
2. 坚定的拒绝（划清界限）
3. 转向的拒绝（提供替代方案）
对每一个：
- 使用场景
- 完整话术（可直接复制粘贴）
- 为什么有效
- 什么时候用哪一种
```
为什么有效：有了话术，说“不”就不难了。
## 28. 会议议程模板
```
会议目的：[目的]
参会人员：[谁]
时长：[分钟数]
目标：[成功的样子]
创建一个议程模板，要求：
- 以目标开场（1 分钟）
- 列出讨论话题并分配时间
- 包含决策点
- 以明确的后续步骤和负责人收尾
然后给我：
- 议程制定者的操作说明
- 参会者的操作说明
- 如何保持准时
- 如何记录决策
```
为什么有效：议程能防止会议变成无效噪音。
## 29. 精力管理时间表
```
我一周的精力规律：
- 早晨：[精力水平]
- 中午：[精力水平]
- 下午：[精力水平]
- 晚上：[精力水平]
我在高精力时能做的事：[活动]
我在低精力时也必须做的事：[活动]
设计一周，要求：
1. 高影响的工作安排在精力高峰期
2. 行政/低价值工作安排在低能量时段
3. 我在精力崩溃之前就休息
4. 我每天结束时都带着进入下一天的动力
向我展示分配好活动的一周结构。
```
为什么有效：大多数效率系统忽略了精力。这个没有。
## 30. 个人季度复盘
```
上个季度我：
- 设定的目标：[目标]
- 完成的目标：[已完成]
- 意外情况：[意外之事]
- 遗憾：[我会改变的]
- 成长：[我如何成长]
下个季度：
- 继续做：[保持]
- 停止做：[停止]
- 开始做：[开始]
给我：
1. 3 个有雄心但可实现的目标
2. 能让其他一切都变容易的那一个习惯
3. 我的个人发展重点
4. 我将如何衡量成功
```
为什么有效：大多数人不回顾自己的进展。回顾能改变一切。
# 研究与数据（5 个提示词）
当你需要快速获得结构化的信息时使用。
## 31. 竞争对手情报摘要
```
公司：[公司名称]
行业：[行业]
我为什么关心：[原因]
给我：
1. 商业模式（他们如何赚钱）
2. 主要产品/服务
3. 近期融资/新闻
4. 他们的竞争优势
5. 已知的弱点
6. 他们下一步可能的动作
格式：[要点列表，便于快速浏览]
```
为什么有效：没有分析的竞争对手研究只是一堆事实。这个提示词给你洞察。
## 32. 行业趋势分析
```
行业：[INDUSTRY]
时间范围：[YEARS]
我的关注点：[WHY]
总结以下方面的主要变化：
1. 客户行为
2. 技术采用
3. 监管变化
4. 竞争格局
5. 定价模式
针对每个趋势：
- 正在发生什么变化
- 为什么重要
- 我应该注意的机会
- 何时重要的时间线
```
为什么有效：趋势本身没那么重要，重要的是理解哪些趋势会影响你。
## 33. 市场规模估算
```
市场：[MARKET]
客户：[WHO_BUYS]
价格点：[TYPICAL_PRICE]
地域范围：[WHERE]
帮我估算：
1. 总体潜在市场（TAM）
2. 可服务市场（SAM）
3. 可获得市场（SOM）
针对每个：
- 你的方法论
- 关键假设
- 估算范围
- 置信度
- 什么因素会改变估算结果
```
为什么有效：市场规模估算一半是艺术，一半是科学。这个提示词两者兼顾。
## 34. 基准研究汇编
```
基准类别：[CATEGORY]
指标：[METRIC]
行业：[INDUSTRY]
公司规模：[SIZE]
帮我找出：
1. 行业平均水平
2. 前25%水平（赢家所在的位置）
3. 后25%水平（表现不佳是什么样子）
4. 中位数
5. 随时间变化的趋势（如有）
针对每个数字：
- 来源（如果你知道）
- 样本量（如已知）
- 计算方式
- 为什么对我的业务重要
```
为什么有效：基准数据提供背景。没有背景，指标毫无意义。
## 35. 专家研究综合
```
主题：[TOPIC]
问题：[WHAT_YOU_WANT_TO_KNOW]
视角：[WHOSE_VIEW_MATTERS]
请通过以下方式综合关于这个主题的研究：
1. 主要思想流派（如果它们存在分歧）
2. 在这方面最可信的声音
3. 数据实际显示什么
4. 常见误解
5. 仍不确定/有争议的部分
6. 对我的情况的实际应用
格式：[顶部为执行摘要，然后是详细分析]
```
为什么有效：没有综合的研究只是噪音。这让它变得有用。
# 如何真正使用这些提示词
这些提示词有效是因为它们具体。但关键是：Claude 比这些提示词更强。如果你把它们当作模板，并根据你的具体情况加以调整，它们的威力会提升10倍。
第1步：复制一个符合你情况的提示词。
第2步：用你的实际信息填写[括号]内容。
第3步：粘贴到 Claude 中并点击发送。
第4步：把输出当作起点，而不是最终答案。
智能不在提示词里，而在你身上。提示词只是为你的思考提供结构，让 Claude 能帮助你更清晰地思考。
# 核心要点
- 策略类提示词迫使你阐明自己真正知道什么，而不是靠猜测
- 内容类提示词将直觉转化为行之有效的框架
- 效率类提示词保护你的时间，而不只是管理时间
- 研究类提示词将信息转化为洞察
- 所有这些都是模板。根据你的情况加以调整，才能获得更好的效果
- Claude 是思考工具，不是答案机器。用这些提示词更清晰、更快速地思考
从每个类别中选一个提示词开始。每周使用一次。观察你的决策变得更快、更好。
附言：我每周都会发送一封邮件，分享旨在将 AI 转化为业务 ROI 的工具、提示词和自动化方案。
在此注册（免费的）每周邮件。
## 相关链接
- [Corey Ganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [@coreyganim](https://x.com/coreyganim)
- [8.2K](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [升级到 Premium](https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up)
- [2026年4月30日 晚上9:07](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073)
- [8,224 次浏览](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/analytics)
- [查看引用](https://x.com/coreyganim/status/2049837999534318073/quotes)
---
*导出时间: 2026/5/1 12:32:30*
